| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| UPES from container Syntax |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| stubie |
 Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:49 am Post subject: UPES from container Syntax |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 05 Nov 2001
Posts: 14
Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Can someone help me with the syntax options for invoking a UPES from a value in a container variable? Let me give a little background:
I have a process with an activity that invokes a UPES. The UPES is named MYUPES, and is defined in MYSYS, a system in MYSYSGRP. If I set the UPES to be invoked in buildtime, it resolves it to MYUPES.MYSYS.MYSYSGRP. So far, so good.
If I put this same fully qualified value in a container member, and then set the activity to invoke UPES from container, it doesn't work at all -- in fact it blows up the execution server. If I put just "MYUPES" in the container variable, it works fine. Still OK.
A problem has arisen with the addition of an additional system in the system group. I have added a second system to allow bulk instantiation without impacting interactive users. But when a process instance created on the second system reaches the UPES activity (first activity), it throws an error to the system log:
| Code: |
| FMC32011E The Program Execution Server MYUPES.MYSYS2.MYSYSGRP is not defined |
This is a true statement, because MYUPES is not defined in MYSYS2. If I change the definition it solves this immediate problem, but causes problems in other process that get created on MYSYS.
Any ideas? Is it time for a PMR? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fidelio |
| Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 45
Location: AttainBPM
|
| Can't you have a definition in each system called MYUPES.MYSYS.MYSYSGRP and MYUPES.MYSYS2.MYSYSGRP that point to the same queue? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
| fidelio wrote: |
| Can't you have a definition in each system called MYUPES.MYSYS.MYSYSGRP and MYUPES.MYSYS2.MYSYSGRP that point to the same queue? |
This sounds like a good solution... but this would not be necessary if the UPES name were not being specified "from container", and I would probably think about opening a PMR just to see what they have to say.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
