| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| .NET Transactions and MQ v6.0 |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Interested in more .NET / MQ Transactional perf studies? |
| No, thanks |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
| Yes, very |
|
75% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 4 |
|
| Author |
Message
|
| dpchiesa |
 Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:07 am Post subject: .NET Transactions and MQ v6.0 |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 46
|
here's a Microsoft blog entry showing the use of .NET 2.0
System.Transactions to manage updates to MQ and SQL Server.
It shows that, using MQ v6 and SQL 2005, if you use System.Transactions, you
can get a 75% throughput improvement, as compared to using
System.EnterpriseServices Transactions in .NET v1.1. Some other results in
there, too.
http://blogs.msdn.com/dotnetinterop/archive/2005/12/01/499090.aspx
_________________
-dpchiesa |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
So, basically, this shows that a) .NET 2.0 is faster than 1.1, and b) MQ v6 is faster than v5.3?
It would be interesting to see the same transactions run against the same database server and MSMQ instead of WMQ.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| dpchiesa |
| Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:03 am Post subject: Basically |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 46
|
| Quote: |
So, basically, this shows that a) .NET 2.0 is faster than 1.1, and b) MQ v6 is faster than v5.3?
|
a) Yes, b) No.
As for a), .NET 2.0 is faster than 1.1; even that is not true as a blanket statement. you can see that there is a performance regression on .NET 2.0 using Sys.ES APIs. Only if you convert to Sys.Tx APIs will you see better performance. That conversion should be simple if you were already using the Services without Components design pattern for Sys.ES in .NET 1.1. But it may not apply to many people.
As for b), MQ v6 is faster than 5.3;
That may be true, but this test used only WMQ 6.0. I don't think there's any comparison in there versus WMQ 5.3. The apps work with WMQ5.3 but I did not run the tests to compare.
| Quote: |
It would be interesting to see the same transactions run against the same database server and MSMQ instead of WMQ.
|
I agree. Also interesting would be to run on server-class hardware, including multi-CPU, and a server OS (WS2003), and to run with different numbers of threads, and larger and more varied payload sizes, and etc.
!!! Lots of interesting work to be done!
_________________
-dpchiesa |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
