| Author |
Message
|
| Kjell |
 Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:57 am Post subject: Support for Oracle 10g in WBIMB |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 26 Feb 2002
Posts: 73
|
Hi
Apparently WBIMB 5 does not support Oracle 10g.
I was wondering, what's the workaround? Is there a way to let a WBIMB flow use exterlan ODBC drivers? Will an own Java node be able to handle this? Or are there other workarounds? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Support is theoretically coming.
It's available on linux now, with a specific fixpack(FP5) and specific patch after that.
I haven't delved into FP6 - it might have added support for this across the board...
You can use JDBC with any JDBC drivers from a Java plugin... at your own risk!
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ian |
| Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 22 Nov 2002
Posts: 152
Location: London, UK
|
WBIMB v5 FP06 does not support Oracle 10g.
The exception to this is WBIMB v5 FP04+ on Linux plus fix LCR016.
WBIMB v5 support for Oracle 10g is currently undergoing lifecycle testing.
When this testing is complete then support for Oracle 10g should be announced (via a FP release).
_________________
Regards, Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Ah. FP4, not FP5. 
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Kjell |
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 26 Feb 2002
Posts: 73
|
OK,
Say we are running non-linux and we do not want to wait for the WBIMB 6.
Is there a way to build an "external db-access module" and CALL it or EXECUTE it from EQSL code? For instance one could think of building something in Java, run it in a separate JRE and concentrate all Oracle db calls to this module. In stead of accessing Oracle from the flow (ESQL) we could in stead CALL this module.
Would this be a possible way to go? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
