|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Can COA be sent before a receiver transaction commit? |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
Maykel |
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 5:43 am Post subject: Can COA be sent before a receiver transaction commit? |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 12 May 2005 Posts: 1
|
Hi All,
I've noticed very strange behavior of client's system.
There's QM_SDR on W2k and a QM_RCVR on HP-UX 11.11. Both 5.3 CSD 07.
QM_SDR sends a message to QM_RCVR. A receiver channel on QM_RCVR has a message exit defined which stamps a message in PutAppName header field with current time.
It looks like this
Code: |
void MQENTRY MsgExit( PMQCXP pChannelExitParams,
PMQCD pChannelDefinition,
PMQLONG pDataLength,
PMQLONG pAgentBufferLength,
PMQBYTE AgentBuffer,
PMQLONG pExitBufferLength,
PMQPTR pExitBufferAddr)
{
switch( pChannelExitParams-> ExitReason )
{
case MQXR_MSG:
{
time_t clock = time( (time_t*) NULL);
struct tm *tmptr = localtime(&clock);
char* appField = (char*) ( ((PMQXQH) AgentBuffer) -> MsgDesc).PutApplName;
memset(appField,0,MQ_PUT_APPL_NAME_LENGTH);
sprintf( appField, TIME_FORMAT,
tmptr->tm_year+1900,
tmptr->tm_mon+1,
tmptr->tm_mday,
tmptr->tm_hour,
tmptr->tm_min,
tmptr->tm_sec % 59 );
break;
}
default:
break;
} /* switch */
pChannelExitParams -> ExitResponse = MQXCC_OK;
return;
}/* end exit */
|
It always happened that timestamp in message exits was same as COA timestamp generated by QM_RCVR. Until yesterday.
QM_SDR was down because of failure for about half on hour.
It received COA with message timestamp 11:00:00. Timestamp in message PutApplName header field read by QM_RCVR client was 11.30:05. If the QM_RCVR client cannot parse PutApplName field according to time format (eg. there was no message exit defined on a channel - not in this case ) it assumes MQGET time. It was indeed 11.30:05.
My question is : Is it possible for QM_RCVR to generate a COA and then after 30 minutes run message exit on receiving channel to stamp a message (and do the commit on receiver queue)?
Or is it possible that message exit was not executed because of...(no idea) ?
Regards,
Maykel |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|