| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| [SOLVED]Staff assignment-Block Activity |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| kotha |
 Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:37 am Post subject: [SOLVED]Staff assignment-Block Activity |
 |
|
Partisan
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 333
|
I have a scenario where one activity should be transferred from one person to other dynamically. I am trying to implement it with a Block activity.
Here is the description:
Activity A -------------> Block (Transition Condition: process = "incomplete" ; Exit Condition for the Block: process = "complete")
Block consists of souce , activity B and Sink
Activity B properties (Staff1: people from container: Reviewer)
At activity A, The data structure values process and Reviewer will be assigned.
based on the Reviewer value, Activity B is assigned.
At Activity B, again The data structure values process and Reviewer will be assigned.
based on the Reviewer value, the same activity (activity B) should be assigned to different person until exit condition met.
But whenever the activity B exits , the Staff value is not changing and activity B is going to the person previously mentioned by Activity A.
i am trying to transfer the work item to different persons from the container.
What is missing in my process diagram?. How should I achieve it....
If you feel this is not the correct implementation, could you suggest any. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
I am having a little trouble following what you are saying.
When Activity B is assigned, lets say that Reviewer contains "USERA". So USERA runs activity B. Now, when Activity B ends, I am assuming that Activty B passes its exit condition and the Block fails its exit condition, causing the Block to run again, and Activity B to go ready. Now, this second time B goes ready, it is going to use the value in the member Reviewer to do the staff assignment. So, IF Activity B did not change the value it is still "USERA" and what you describe is the expected result. If Activity B did change the value of Reviewer, then your mapping must be wrong.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kotha |
| Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 333
|
| jmac wrote: |
| If Activity B did change the value of Reviewer, then your mapping must be wrong. |
you understand it clearly.
I have one data structure, say XYZ with two member values: Reviewer, process.
for all activities and programs and for the process input , output data strucutre is XYZ.
So by default, every memebr of the data structure mapped to the same of the output.
Do I need to map explicitly? can I send my FDL? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
It will be easiest for me if you send the FDL to my email address.
Please be sure to do an export of the process DEEP so that I have everything I need, and don't have to guess.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
You need a Data Loop connector on the Block. I assume that your activity JdrDecisionMaking is setting a new value into the Reviewer member, this member is then mapped to the sink.
BUT you need to get the new value mapped back to the source of the block for your second time thru the block. The solution to this is the Data Loop connector at the block level, which will map the output of the block to the input of the block (i.e the source), thus second time in you will get the new value.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kotha |
| Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 333
|
John,
Problem SOLVED....
as you said, with Data loop connector, it is perfect now!!!!.
Thanx John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
