Author |
Message
|
samgunddi |
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:18 am Post subject: Open OutputCount on transmition queue of broker (to ConfigM) |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 54
|
Quote: |
$ ps -ef|grep -v grep|grep default
mqsiadm 11929 11919 0 12:21:32 ? 0:03 DataFlowEngine WBRKBK XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX default 1
$ echo "dis qstatus(WBRKCMQM) TYPE(HANDLE) PID"|runmqsc WBRKBKQM|grep -v grep|grep 11929
QUEUE(WBRKCMQM) PID(11929)
QUEUE(WBRKCMQM) PID(11929) |
I want the opinion of gurus on this matter.
Borker on solaris box; ConfigMgr on windows 2000; On transmission queue (to ConfigMgr) of the broker qmgr there are 2 handles opened for output by default EG.
Every thing in this environment works normally. There are several EG’s working as prescribed.
Has anyone faced this?
Thanks in advance! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EddieA |
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001 Posts: 2453 Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote: |
Every thing in this environment works normally |
So, what is the problem.
Cheers, _________________ Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JT |
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Padawan
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Posts: 1564 Location: Hartford, CT.
|
How many message flows are deployed to the 'default' execution group, 2? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samgunddi |
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 54
|
Thanks for the replies!
Eddie, Guess I was curious.
JT, I had the same doubt and removed all the messages flows, but did not change the handles count on the Transmission queue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samgunddi |
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 54
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PeterPotkay |
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001 Posts: 7722
|
How do you know it is the default EG that has the XMITQ open?
I guess I do not know how to figure out that the PID of 11929 maps to a particular EG.
Assuming there is a way to prove PID 11929 is the default EG:
I agree if there are no flows in that EG, then why does it have 2 hooks into the XMITQ.
Does it still show that after a Broker restart? _________________ Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
samgunddi |
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Acolyte
Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 54
|
I checked this after removing all the flow for this broker
The default DataflowEngine is running under the PID 11929
Quote: |
$ ps -ef|grep -v grep|grep default
mqsiadm 11929 11919 0 12:21:32 ? 0:03 DataFlowEngine WBRKBK XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX default 1 |
So i have checked the XMITQ for the open handle's
Quote: |
$ echo "dis qstatus(WBRKCMQM) TYPE(HANDLE) PID"|runmqsc WBRKBKQM|grep -v grep|grep 11929
QUEUE(WBRKCMQM) PID(11929)
QUEUE(WBRKCMQM) PID(11929) |
And yes, this happned even after the restart. I will open a PMR on this today. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|