Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:26 am Post subject: when you use JMS /IBM MQ series?
Newbie
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 3
Hello,
JMS is a specification given by SUN and all these MOM implemented in their own way right ? If u try to send some data on q1 on QM1 using JMS or using MQ series implementation in the both cases it will be placed on the same queue on QM1 - q1
Is this correct ? the only difference you find is only in the header part of the data am i right ?
Is pub/sub is implmented in native MQ series interface also ?
In case if the client is there on remote system then to communicate with MQ server we use JMS in this case we cant use MQ series Please correct me if i am wrong. If you have an application which runs on the same physical server on which the MQ series server is installed then which one is better to use
JMS/ MQ series ? Pls give me some pointers based on what factors we choose one ?
Joined: 27 Aug 2001 Posts: 3023 Location: Dallas, TX, USA
You can use JMS or WMQ to place a message on a specific queue on a specific qmgr. JMS messages tend to carry an RFH2 header that contains the JMS properties of the message. However, this is optional (search here on targclient).
You can use publish/subscribe without using JMS. SupportPac MA0C (which now ships with FixPack acts as a publish/subscribe broker. It even ships a soccer game sample which is NOT JMS based. (In my opinion,) JMS makes dealing with pub/sub easier.
You can connect as a client (ie, a remote machine) to a qmgr using either JMS or base WMQ. You can also connect in bindings mode to a qmgr using either JMS or base WMQ. Both transports are supported in both places.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum