| Author |
Message
|
| techno |
 Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 4:21 pm Post subject: JMS Synchronous Communication. |
 |
|
Chevalier
Joined: 22 Jan 2003
Posts: 429
|
| This is very stupid question... I have read some docs mentioning that JMS does not support Synchronous communication. It doesn't make any sense for me. What is the context they are saying... Anybody throws some light.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vennela |
| Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
Where did you read this?
I don't think that is true |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
Whether this is true or not ?
However the whole point of JMS is ASYNCHRONOUS communication.
Why use JMS for synchronous communication when you can call a web service or do an RMI, use CORBA etc....
Enjoy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQGuy2000 |
| Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Posts: 131
|
JMS is desiged for asynchronous communication. But we can code our application to use it in a synchronous way.
Thats my understanding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| timber725 |
| Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 1
|
This has been a long debate with the companies I've worked for. We struggle to attempt to make synchronous calls function properly with JMS, but it seems all so wrong and backward.
I'd be interested to hear from someone who have successfully implemented this and is happy with the final design and implementation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
