ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » More Dataflowengine.exe's than Executiongroups in the toolki

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 More Dataflowengine.exe's than Executiongroups in the toolki « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Feysn
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:11 am    Post subject: More Dataflowengine.exe's than Executiongroups in the toolki Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Wilrijk

Dear,

There are more dataflowengine's running on my broker machine than there are Execution groups in the toolkit. These are execution groups that were deleted. For one reason the dataflowengines remain active and the messageflows deployed to those are still up and running. Is there a possibility to delete those dataflowengines because I can't conrol them anymore

Thans
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kirani
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA

Please provide your environment details. Are you at the latest fixpack? Some people in this forum have seen this kind of behaviour before and I belive the problem was resolved after they applied the latest CSD (CSD4).
_________________
Kiran


IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chenulu
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 27 Mar 2002
Posts: 87
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC

Hi Feysn,

This could happen if the EG was deleted from the toolkit and you do not get a successful response from the broker. The EG does not get cleaned up from BROKERAAEG table. The broker upon startup reads this table to start the EGs from this table.

If you issue an mqsibrowse BrokerName -t BROKERAAGE you will see the EGs that the broker thinks existing are displayed.

-- Chenulu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kirani
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA

How would one clean-up these?
Would complete deploy of the broker help?
_________________
Kiran


IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chenulu
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 27 Mar 2002
Posts: 87
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC

Hi,

This issue is currently being investigated and I will post the results once a resolution is found.

-- Chenulu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kirani
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA

Is there any workaround for this problem?
I guess one of the workaround would be not to delete any EG after it's created??
_________________
Kiran


IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feysn
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Wilrijk

Thanks for all the replies,

Indeed we are now at the CSD3 level. I will apply the CSD4 and come back with results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chenulu
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 27 Mar 2002
Posts: 87
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC

Hi Kiran,

Regarding the workaround, this does not happen all the time from what I know. Ensure that you get a successful response from the broker (for the implicit deploy) when you delete any component.

-- Chenulu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Feysn
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:23 am    Post subject: Solution Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Wilrijk

Dear all, who have helped me during this topic.

Solution for these problem is.

Stop the Broker
Delete in the Broker DB in the following tables the record with the ExecutionGroupUUID:
BRMINFO
BRMPHYSICALRES
BRMRTDDEPINFO
BRMRTDINFO
BRMWFDINFO
BROKERAAEG
BROKERRESOURCES

To determine the UUID for the Executiongroups you need the Windows Process ID in the case that you work on a windows machine. This can in an easy way be determined when the broker is running via the debugger. With the process ID you can find the UUID and with the UUID you can delete the records<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kirani
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA

Hmmm .. It's very dangerous to update Broker's Internal database manually.
_________________
Kiran


IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Feysn
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Wilrijk

Sure Kiran it is dangerous to do. But sometimes this is the only solution. Because on CSD04 we had the same problem.


Because we are in a Hot-Failover/ Disaster Setup we can't recreate the broker as IBM proposed to us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » More Dataflowengine.exe's than Executiongroups in the toolki
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.