| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| Flow works in test, but not in prod. |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| pfarrel |
 Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:04 am Post subject: Flow works in test, but not in prod. |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Kansas City
|
I have a flow that works in test, but not in prod.
How should I go about debugging this ? Here are the error messages that come out in prod:
Oct 29 16:07:11 lp11prdg MQSIv500[729260]: (WBIBUXP1.VRU)[7712]BIP2628E: Exception condition detected on
input node 'com.cbi.msgflows.VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST.VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST'. :
WBIBUXP1.97c260b6-ff00-0000-0080-88e575ecec6f: /build/S500_P/src/DataFlowEngine/ImbMqInputNode.cpp: 2045:
ImbMqInputNode::readQueue: ComIbmMQInputNode: com/cbi/msgflows/VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST#FCMComposite_1_9
Oct 29 16:07:11 lp11prdg MQSIv500[729260]: (WBIBUXP1.VRU)[7712]BIP2230E: Error detected whilst processing
a message in node 'com.cbi.msgflows.VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST.CICS?'. :
WBIBUXP1.97c260b6-ff00-0000-0080-88e575ecec6f: /build/S500_P/src/DataFlowEngine/ImbFilterNode.cpp: 300:
ImbFilterNode::evaluate: ComIbmFilterNode: com/cbi/msgflows/VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST#FCMComposite_1_14
Oct 29 16:07:11 lp11prdg MQSIv500[729260]: (WBIBUXP1.VRU)[7712]BIP2488E:
(com.cbi.msgflows.VRU_REQUEST_V02_04_CICS?.main, 2.1) Error detected whilst executing the SQL statement
'RETURN Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'A000' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'A010' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'A020' OR
Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'A030' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'F000' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'H000' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE =
'ACHG' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'F050' OR Body.e_REQ_CODE = 'F060';'. :
WBIBUXP1.97c260b6-ff00-0000-0080-88e575ecec6f:
/build/S500_P/src/DataFlowEngine/ImbRdl/ImbRdlStatementGroup.cpp: 158: SqlStatementGroup::execute:
ComIbmFilterNode: com/cbi/msgflows/VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST#FCMComposite_1_14
Oct 29 16:07:11 lp11prdg MQSIv500[729260]: (WBIBUXP1.VRU)[7712]BIP5347E: MtiImbParser2: RM has thrown an
unknown exception. : WBIBUXP1.97c260b6-ff00-0000-0080-88e575ecec6f:
/build/S500_P/src/MTI/MTIforBroker/MtiImbParser2/MtiImbRMErrorMap.cpp: 163: MtiImbRMErrorMap::checkRC: :
Oct 29 16:07:11 lp11prdg MQSIv500[729260]: (WBIBUXP1.VRU)[7969]BIP2648E: Message backed out to a queue;
node 'com.cbi.msgflows.VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST.VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST'. :
WBIBUXP1.97c260b6-ff00-0000-0080-88e575ecec6f: /build/S500_P/src/DataFlowEngine/ImbMqInputNode.cpp: 3382:
ImbMqInputNode::eligibleForBackout: ComIbmMQInputNode:
com/cbi/msgflows/VRU_SERVICE_REQUEST#FCMComposite_1_9
O |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| vennela |
| Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| Maybe you should tell more about your flow, your input message, expected output versions of products etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Or consider the possibility that one of the values you are checking against in your RETURN statement is NULL rather than a meaningful value.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Nizam |
| Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Disciple
Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Posts: 160
|
| Did you apply the same fix packs for your production environment? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kirani |
| Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 05 Sep 2001
Posts: 3779
Location: Torrance, CA, USA
|
Did you test this message flow in Dev with the same (failed) input message from Prod?
Just a suggestion. You can use IN clause instead of multiple OR statements. For example,
| Code: |
RETURN (Body.e_REQ_CODE in ('A000','A010','A020','A030','F000','H000','ACHG','F050','F060'));
|
_________________
Kiran
IBM Cert. Solution Designer & System Administrator - WBIMB V5
IBM Cert. Solutions Expert - WMQI
IBM Cert. Specialist - WMQI, MQSeries
IBM Cert. Developer - MQSeries
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| pfarrel |
| Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Kansas City
|
We have found the problem.
The problem was that UDB needs additional shared memory segments on AIX. This was a difference between our test and production systems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
