ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Client Conn or Server Con ....

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Client Conn or Server Con .... « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
mq_guru
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:51 am    Post subject: Client Conn or Server Con .... Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 13

Which one of these is the best to use. And why
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

You can't use one without the other.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bower5932
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 27 Aug 2001
Posts: 3023
Location: Dallas, TX, USA

Unless he is asking about client connection vs. bindings?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
leongor
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Master

Joined: 13 May 2002
Posts: 264
Location: Israel

Basically client sonnection is better : you don't have 4MB limitation for a message.
Also using client channel table gives you ability for connection failover.
If you code in Java you can use only server connection.
_________________
Regards.
Leonid.

IBM Certified MQSeries Specialist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Sorry Leonid

Java will allow you to use a bindings connection or a client connection.
Apart from a few security holes that you will have to plug...

What you cannot use with Java is the client Channel table in the same way you'd be using it in C. You will have to code a number of things and cannot rely on automatic failover...

Enjoy
F.J.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
gunter
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 21 Jan 2004
Posts: 307
Location: Germany, Frankfurt

binding
- significant faster
- easier to handle, no configuration is needed
- less error codes to handle by the applications
- the application has to run on the machine where the queuemanager is running

client:
- the client can be installed at all systems in the network where a supportet os is running.
- the application can use a different os than the queuemanager

If your application has to use a different machine than the queuemanager or this aspect is unclear, use client connection.
If it's clear, that the application uses the same machine, use bindings.
More flexible is to load client or server libs dynamically, but this more work for the programmer.
_________________
Gunter Jeschawitz
IBM Certified System Administrator - Websphere MQ, 5.3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » Client Conn or Server Con ....
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.