Author |
Message
|
sarat |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:34 am Post subject: regarding trace node |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 136 Location: India
|
Hi guys
will we get the same output while using the trace node and mqsichangetracelog?if yes what is the diffrernce between that?
plz reply _________________ With Regards,
Sarat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
Please try harder to answer your own questions. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tibor |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:38 am Post subject: Re: regarding trace node |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 1033 Location: Hungary
|
sarat wrote: |
Hi guys
will we get the same output while using the trace node and mqsichangetracelog?if yes what is the diffrernce between that?
plz reply |
Absolutely not.
- a trace node shows the value of selected variables
- internal trace shows tracing/debugging information of a flow
Tibor |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sarat |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:44 am Post subject: Re: regarding trace node |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 136 Location: India
|
thanks 4 ur reply..can u explain in detail.. _________________ With Regards,
Sarat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:57 am Post subject: Re: regarding trace node |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
sarat wrote: |
thanks 4 ur reply..can u explain in detail.. |
Why don't you try running both, and comparing the two outputs, to see for yourself? _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tibor |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 1033 Location: Hungary
|
This is a snippet of trace node output:
Quote: |
2005-08-17 16:42:54.879806|IK_ONL_OSS_REKOD_IN|OSS|ALLOC_REQ|REKOD_OSS_ONL_IN
2005-08-17 16:48:33.667526|IK_ONL_REKOD_OSS_IN|REKOD|ALLOC_RESPONSE|OSS_REKOD_ONL_IN
|
For comparision: output of mqsiformatlog
Quote: |
2005-01-11 16:14:43.516269 4113 UserTrace BIP2632I: Message received and propagated to 'out' terminal of MQ input node 'IK_Batch.InQ'.
2005-01-11 16:14:43.516834 4113 UserTrace BIP6060I: Parser type 'Properties' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length 0 bytes beginning at offset '0'.
2005-01-11 16:14:43.517265 4113 UserTrace BIP6061I: Parser type 'MQMD' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length '364' bytes beginning at offset '0'. Parser type selected based on value 'MQHMD' from previous parser.
2005-01-11 16:14:43.517478 4113 UserTrace BIP6061I: Parser type 'MQRFH2' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length '276' bytes beginning at offset '364'. Parser type selected based on value 'MQHRF2' from previous parser.
2005-01-11 16:14:43.517883 4113 UserTrace BIP6061I: Parser type 'BLOB' created on behalf of node 'IK_Batch.InQ' to handle portion of incoming message of length '363' bytes beginning at offset '640'. Parser type selected based on value 'NONE' from previous parser.
...
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tibor |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:03 am Post subject: Re: regarding trace node |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 1033 Location: Hungary
|
jefflowrey wrote: |
sarat wrote: |
thanks 4 ur reply..can u explain in detail.. |
Why don't you try running both, and comparing the two outputs, to see for yourself? |
Jeff: maybe a cordial RTFM?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sarat |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Centurion
Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 136 Location: India
|
thanks a lot _________________ With Regards,
Sarat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:10 am Post subject: Re: regarding trace node |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
Tibor wrote: |
Jeff: maybe a cordial RTFM?  |
Instead of a cordial "What happens when you try it?"?
Is encouraging learning through reading more cordial than encouraging learning through experimentation? _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|