| Author |
Message
|
| techno |
 Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 10:20 am Post subject: qmgr alias |
 |
|
Chevalier
Joined: 22 Jan 2003
Posts: 429
|
I need some help here.
From intercommunications manual:
define qremote(qm3) rname() rqmname(qm3) xmitq(qm2)
what is the significance of rqmname(qm3) ? what would happen if we put something else here, because it should follow xmit-q for message flow.
Thanks
Shiva. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| mrlinux |
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2002
Posts: 1261
Location: Detroit,MI USA
|
The rqmanme field needs to contain the name of the Remote Queue Manager the message is headed for, in most cases the XMITQ Name matches the QMGR but it doesnt have to.
_________________
Jeff
IBM Certified Developer MQSeries
IBM Certified Specialist MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert MQSeries |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| techno |
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 22 Jan 2003
Posts: 429
|
Sorry, I am not clear.
Are rqmname(qm3) xmitq(qm2) realted to each other? Suppose, if the definition has
qm2 is connecting to qmgrx instead of qm3
then what will happen? I thought the message follows xmitq, not the rqmname. Pls clear me.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EddieA |
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Posts: 2453
Location: Los Angeles
|
This syntax is, usually, used on intermediate QMGRs when multihopping messages. What it means is:
When you receive a message destined for qm3, put it on XMITQ qm2.
Cheers,
_________________
Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| techno |
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 22 Jan 2003
Posts: 429
|
Do we have am1* utility programs to experiment multi-hopping. So, do we have any utility for putting a message say, being at qm1, putting message to qm4.queue of qm4?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| EddieA |
| Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi
Joined: 28 Jun 2001
Posts: 2453
Location: Los Angeles
|
Sure. You just put a mesage the same as a local queue. The utility doesn't know you're multi-hopping.
Just put to a remote Q on qm1, that has qm4 as the destination queue manager.
Cheers,
_________________
Eddie Atherton
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V6.1
IBM Certified Solution Developer - WebSphere Message Broker V7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
