I am running MQSI 202 on NT on a 2 CPU Intel box. We did some performance testing by running a batch of messages through MQSI. We took down the elapse time for the batch to complete with the message flow in a single execution group. When we have the flow in 2 execution groups, the elapse time is about half. We then add the flow to a 3rd execution group, the time does change much (less than 5% reduction). I think we have the 2 CPUs fully utilized with the 2 execution group. We cannot turn on additonal incidence until we have time to fix a known problem within the flow.
We were just wondering if there will be a big difference running a flows in two execution group vs running a flow in a single execution group with additional incidence =1.
Joined: 05 Sep 2001 Posts: 3779 Location: Torrance, CA, USA
Running the same message flow in two execution group will consume more memory than the other option (setting additional instance=1) as each EG is a seperate process. If you don't have any memory limit then this option gives best throughput.
We achieved almost 2 times more throughput by setting additional instance=1 for a message flow. However, the difference between these two options was not be very big. We achieved around 10% performance gain by deploying a copy of the message flow to 2 execution groups as compared to setting additional instance to 1.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum