ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » which is a better implementation of message flows

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 which is a better implementation of message flows « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
k.srinivas
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 2:39 am    Post subject: which is a better implementation of message flows Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 16 May 2002
Posts: 29
Location: chennai

hi guys
i have a generic xmlmessage on a queue.according to my requirent i need to use a compute node where some fields are removed and some new firleds are added.
there are 2ways to do this
1.use like a generic xm where the message is not defined
2.describe the message in mrm and try to do all the changes
plz advice me which is the best way for dealing with generic xml messages and which is very easy to implement
regards
srinivas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dkeister
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Disciple

Joined: 25 Mar 2002
Posts: 184
Location: Purchase, New York

Personally, I never describe the XML message. I just reference the fields as needed. Not sure what value describing the XML message has (other than it forces you to really understand it), or to be able to drag/drop to create the ESQL (which I never use).

I'm interested to see 'pros' to defining the XML message...

Dean
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

The pros of defining the XML message in the MRM is to be able to validate the contents of the XML incoming data using the MRM, instead of having to write ESQL.

Using the MRM to parse and validate XML is slower than using the XML or XMLNS parsers.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » which is a better implementation of message flows
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.