ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer » Load Balancing

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Load Balancing « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Ratan
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 9:01 am    Post subject: Load Balancing Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245

Here is my scenario:

I have 2 WF servers (3.4.4) on two boxes(same Group) and a WF CLient (3.4.4, Client with QM)

When both the WF Systems are running, I dont have a problem Loggin in, but when I take down one of the WF Systems and leave the QM running, I cant login to WF Server anymore from the Client (I am not specifying the system name to connect to from the client).

When I take both QM and WF System on one machine down, I can login from the client (logsin to the system that is running). I believe this is being taken care of the MQ Cluster load balancing.

I am unable to understand, why I am not able to login to the running WF System, when one WF Server is down with QM in that system running.

If MQ Cluster load balancing is taking charge and sending requests to the failed WF Server as the QM there is still running, I would expect alternative login requests to be succesfull, as one of the WF Systems is running.

Any thoughts???
_________________
-Ratan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
vennela
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India

I would anticipate this behaviour.

When a client tries to login, there will be a message put on some queue and this message will be carried over by MQ to the workflow server to process and respond back.

When there are two workflow servers then, the login requests that are put on this queue will be round robinned to the two workflow server QMGRs and the workflow server would process the login requests and reply to those requests.

Say if the workflow server is down while the QMGR of that server is still up, MQ cluster has no idea that the workflow server is down. It will still keep sending the requests to both the QMGRs. The only difference now is, on the QMGR where the workflow server is down, there is nobody to process the workflow requsets sent by the client.

If you take down the workflow server while keep the QMGR running and try to issue a login, I would bet on some of the queues on the QMGR where the workflow server is not running CURDEPTH will increase.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ratan
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1245

Venny, I agree with you. I know the requests will round robin. So I expect atleast alternative Login requests will be succesfull, but all the request fail. In MQ queue, I see all Requests pilling up on the failed MQWF box.
_________________
-Ratan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Workflow Engines - IBM MQ Workflow & Business Process Choreographer » Load Balancing
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.