| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| Pub/Sub - Pub set new MsgId |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| zbyszanna |
 Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:50 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Novice
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Posts: 23
|
Yes, it can be guaranteed. As I said before, this is by design. Only one application will reply, the other will just receive the copy of the message flow.
We don't want to use different methods of correlation. That is the sole point of this exercise. We want to get a copy of message stream without the need of altering our applications. If we could force topics/subs to retain the msgid, it would be a perfect solution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| zbyszanna wrote: |
Yes, it can be guaranteed. As I said before, this is by design. Only one application will reply, the other will just receive the copy of the message flow.
We don't want to use different methods of correlation. That is the sole point of this exercise. We want to get a copy of message stream without the need of altering our applications. If we could force topics/subs to retain the msgid, it would be a perfect solution. |
In this case you need to get a little bit inventive in your pub/sub and make sure the subscription is not received by correlID (the default case). If the sender then sets the flag to generate a correlid and checks for that (minor change) you might be able to get away with it... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| RogerLacroix |
| Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada
|
| zbyszanna wrote: |
| We don't want to use different methods of correlation. That is the sole point of this exercise. We want to get a copy of message stream without the need of altering our applications. If we could force topics/subs to retain the msgid, it would be a perfect solution. |
Why don't you have a look at MQ Message Replication. Its whole purpose is to clone a message which includes MsgId.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zbyszanna |
| Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Posts: 23
|
| RogerLacroix wrote: |
Why don't you have a look at MQ Message Replication. Its whole purpose is to clone a message which includes MsgId. |
We have our in house solution for this case, but it requires an active element to exist, and so we were checking out pure WMQ solution to this problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| JosephGramig |
| Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Posts: 1244
Location: Gold Coast of Florida, USA
|
Ya know if you have IIB, a simple flow could do this. You could even have the cheapest version do this (One node and one EG/Integration Server).
Just saying... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
