| Author |
Message
|
| Muthukrishnan |
 Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:26 am Post subject: XSD definition within WSDL |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Feb 2013
Posts: 48
|
Hi,
We have developed a web service provider using WMB 8.0.0.2 and exposed. One of the application team using .NET is unable to consume our service since the XSD is not embedded within the WSDL. The broker internally creates an include statement to include the schema definition into the WSDL.
The application team did not have the feature to use the local copy of the WSDL. Even the referenced schema is not accessible.
Hence we have asked the application team to write a separate program to call our service. Is this a kind of limition of WMB not to include the XSD definition within the WSDL?
Please clarify. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| kimbert |
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
| Quote: |
| The broker internally creates an include statement to include the schema definition into the WSDL. |
Correct - WMB does not create WSDLs with inline xsds. It can import them, but it will save the xsd(s) separately from the WSDL.
| Quote: |
| The application team did not have the feature to use the local copy of the WSDL. Even the referenced schema is not accessible. |
I don't understand. What do you mean by 'not accessible'?
| Quote: |
| One of the application team using .NET is unable to consume our service since the XSD is not embedded within the WSDL. |
Is this a kind of limitation of .NET?
| Quote: |
| Hence we have asked the application team to write a separate program to call our service. |
Sounds like a fairly drastic response to the problem. Surely there's a better solution than that?
_________________
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ganesh |
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 294
|
| Quote: |
Is this a kind of limition of WMB not to include the XSD definition within the WSDL?
|
Its a good practise to have the xsd seperate from the wsdl for ease of readability.
| Quote: |
| The application team did not have the feature to use the local copy of the WSDL. Even the referenced schema is not accessible |
If they need the xsd and wsdl for their development purpose you can send them a copy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
If you enable the "?wsdl" function on the soap input node, this problem goes away.
By which I mean, the deployed flow will return a single wsdl file with all xsds inlined, when you ask the service for ?wsdl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ganesh |
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 294
|
| Quote: |
| By which I mean, the deployed flow will return a single wsdl file with all xsds inlined, when you ask the service for ?wsdl |
It will still return only a wsdl with a reference to location of xsd like below.
| Code: |
<xsd:schema>
<xsd:import namespace="*****" schemaLocation="https://***/**?xsd=xsd0" />
</xsd:schema>
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Muthukrishnan |
| Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:34 pm Post subject: XSD definition within WSDL |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Feb 2013
Posts: 48
|
Yes. Ganesh you are right. So this is the problem we are facing. If this the good practise to have the xsd seperate from the wsdl then there is no choice except the change at the application that is consuming the service. I would like to confirm this. Please clarify.
@kimbert , What i meant by not accessible is that the .NET application is unable to consume the service. Yes it is a limitation of this application. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| kimbert |
| Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 5542
Location: Southampton
|
WSDLs often do contain inline xsds. This is a valid way to design WSDLs.
WMB/IIB cannot handle WSDLs with inline xsds so they automatically extract the xsds into separate files.
It looks as if .NET cannot handle WSDLs *without* inline xsds. So give it the original WSDL, not the one exported by WMB/IIB.
_________________
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way you're a mile away, and you have their shoes too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| ganesh wrote: |
| Quote: |
| By which I mean, the deployed flow will return a single wsdl file with all xsds inlined, when you ask the service for ?wsdl |
It will still return only a wsdl with a reference to location of xsd like below.
| Code: |
<xsd:schema>
<xsd:import namespace="*****" schemaLocation="https://***/**?xsd=xsd0" />
</xsd:schema>
|
|
I thought they fixed that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Muthukrishnan |
| Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:39 am Post subject: XSD definition within WSDL |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Feb 2013
Posts: 48
|
| Thanks all for your reply. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| 7207165620 |
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:09 am Post subject: WSDL accessible on browser but unable to import into Soap UI |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 11 Apr 2013
Posts: 37
|
Hi Muthukrishnan,
I am facing the same issue with client since one week. But my client is trying to import WSDL through Soap UI but not getting.
But in your case was your client able to test from Soap Ui ?
Kindly reply me the process you followed to resolve this ?
I posted this in MQSeries and in process of getting it resolved from IIB end without changing client application.
Thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Muthukrishnan |
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 16 Feb 2013
Posts: 48
|
Hi,
I myself was able to test through SOAP UI. We need to copy the reference xsd in our local system and use it from SOAP UI. But the client were not able to call from .NET. So they changed the code at their end.
Please let me know if you need any additional inputs from my side.
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
