| Author |
Message
|
| harshatej1 |
 Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:26 am Post subject: channel status not found |
 |
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Posts: 61
|
I'm running MQ (5.1) on a solaris box(5.1 version.
I start two channels sender(A.TO.B) and receiver(B.TO.A)
when I do a "display chstatus(A.TO.B) I get results showing that the
channel is up. Doing the same for (B.TO.A) gives a message saying
"Channel status not found".
I started sender channel and it started. but when they are trying to start the receiver(mainframe box) channel, they are getting 'terminally executed' error at the mainframe side.
Could you please tell me where exactly is the problem? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:52 am Post subject: Re: channel status not found |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| harshatej1 wrote: |
I'm running MQ (5.1) on a solaris box(5.1 version.
I start two channels sender(A.TO.B) and receiver(B.TO.A)
when I do a "display chstatus(A.TO.B) I get results showing that the
channel is up. Doing the same for (B.TO.A) gives a message saying
"Channel status not found".
I started sender channel and it started. but when they are trying to start the receiver(mainframe box) channel, they are getting 'terminally executed' error at the mainframe side.
Could you please tell me where exactly is the problem? |
There is no channel status 'UP'. Do you mean RUNNING?
While I haven't had my hands on a v5.1 MVS instance of MQ, I don't recall an error 'terminally executed'.
Errors detected by WMQ on all platforms include error message numbers and technical narrative. On MVS, errors from MQ take on the form CSQnnnnn, where nnnnn is a number. Exactly what error is in the MVS SYSLOGs from their attempt to start their SENDER channel?
'Channel status not found' would be appropriate for a channel that is not currently active.
In future posts, please provide technical details - like complete error messages copied/pasted from the error logs and SYSLOGs.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| harshatej1 |
| Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Posts: 61
|
Yes, UP means Running.
This is the error in the Main Frame side.
B.TO.A SENDER QMGR MQSA RETRY
+CSQX209E *MQA CSQXRESP Connection unexpectedly terminated, 284
channel B.TO.A,
connection ::ffff:172.26.90.137 (::ffff:172.26.90.137)
(queue manager MQM.XXXX)
TRPTYPE=TCP
+CSQX599E *MQA CSQXRESP Channel B.TO.A ended abnormally |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
According to http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmqv7/v7r0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.mq.csqsao.doc%2Fzm24120_.htm
the entire syntax of the error is:
| Quote: |
| CSQX209E: csect-name Connection unexpectedly terminated, channel channel-name, connection conn-id (queue manager qmgr-name) TRPTYPE=trptype RC=return-code (return-text) reason=reason |
Please post the complete error message.
Did you research CSQX209E? What does it tell you to do? Did you do it?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AkankshA |
| Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Singapore
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| harshatej1 |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Posts: 61
|
But the people from application side posted this error message.
I researched and found that this error occurs when get property of transmission queue is disabled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| harshatej1 wrote: |
| But the people from application side posted this error message. |
Application people shouldn't be seeing this message. Or at least shouldn't be looking in the subsystem logs where these are reported.
| harshatej1 wrote: |
| I researched and found that this error occurs when get property of transmission queue is disabled. |
Researched where? A psychic hotline? Quote your sources.
If this:
| harshatej1 wrote: |
connection ::ffff:172.26.90.137 (::ffff:172.26.90.137)
|
In any way indicates a IPv4 address in an IPv6 format then this will not work in v5.1 and will cause any number of failures, including potentially this.
As has been said many times, WMQv5.1 is out of support and the MF software may be causing it to malfunction if it's not contemporary with WMQv5.1, i.e. as old and out of support.
And if it is, your estate is a disaster waiting to happen.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
Or, equally, a more modern IP stack on the distributed side could likewise be causing an issue.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| harshatej1 |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Posts: 61
|
Application means Main Frame side. I apologize for using 'research' word.
The issuse that i'm facing is
System Admins have copied the entire file system from one server to the other and changed the DNS IP address. Then MF side changed the IP address
on their sender channel.
But the channel is going to retrying status.
A.TO.B RECEIVER QMGR MQSA 2 RUN
B.TO.A SENDER QMGR MQSA RETRY
From the server side(A) listener is running. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| harshatej1 wrote: |
| I apologize for using 'research' word. |
Don't apologixe for reasearching; I just wondered where you dug that up so I can refute whoever runs that site!
| harshatej1 wrote: |
| System Admins have copied the entire file system from one server to the other and changed the DNS IP address. |
Why did they do that? Why did they think that wasn't going to cause problems? Did they copy the entire file system or just the bits with WMQ on it?
It sounds like you've corrupted your fragile and out-of-support WMQ software with something else in the OS stack. Or in the network, which now takes a different route to this new server and potentially through new hardware, which may be where this IPV6-like address is turning up. Which will confuse WMQv5.1 no end.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| exerk |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339
|
| harshatej1 wrote: |
The issuse that i'm facing is
System Admins have copied the entire file system from one server to the other and changed the DNS IP address. Then MF side changed the IP address
on their sender channel.
But the channel is going to retrying status.
A.TO.B RECEIVER QMGR MQSA 2 RUN
B.TO.A SENDER QMGR MQSA RETRY
From the server side(A) listener is running. |
Did the Mainframe MQ Admins reset the SDR channel their side?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| harshatej1 |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Posts: 61
|
Yes, they have changed the IP address on the sender side.
Yes, they copied the entire file system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
It's network
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| harshatej1 |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Nov 2013
Posts: 61
|
| The network people are saying that everything is fine from their side |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| harshatej1 wrote: |
| The network people are saying that everything is fine from their side |
Of course they did. If I have a nickel for every time...
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
