ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Pub/Sub model using Message Driven Beans vs MB

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Pub/Sub model using Message Driven Beans vs MB « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
schandolu
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:26 pm    Post subject: Pub/Sub model using Message Driven Beans vs MB Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Posts: 9

Hi,
We are working on one RFP and insight is given below.
RFP Insight:Our use case has one Publisher and two subscribers.Publisher and Subscribers includes Data Loading, Data Validation,Transformation,Logging and Error Handling logic.

Message flow is 10 lakh message per hour.

1.Approach 1:Pub/Sub pattern using MB & MQ as part of ESB
2.Approach 2:Pub/Sub Pattern using Message Driven Beans for Subscribers and Publisher(J2EE Application) and host on Websphere..

We know that both the apporaches will be able to do the job.But which is the best way to do it and optimised one interms of performanace and Scalability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

A number of posters who post here are happy to provide you with their rates for consulting fees.

You're really asking for consulting services.

I would say that option 1 is always best, becuase I always prefer to use Broker for everything.

That doesn't mean that your definition of "best" is the same as mine.

Consider as well, if you are unable to answer this question yourself and write this RFP yourself without extra external help, and your company wins the bid, are you going to be able to deliver the solution yourself without external help?

The answer is, both are best in terms of performance and scalability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
schandolu
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 26 Dec 2013
Posts: 9

When I searched for MDB(Message Driven Beans) integration with MQ,I found the below link
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v7r0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.websphere.express.doc%2Finfo%2Fexp%2Fae%2Fcmm_comp_arch.html

which says MDB hinders the performance and Websphere Integration with MQ is not seamless.
Does anybody faced this issue in real time and any pointers on this will really be helpfull
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » Pub/Sub model using Message Driven Beans vs MB
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.