| Author |
Message
|
| Esa |
 Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:16 am Post subject: RFH2 and monitoring profile |
 |
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
It does not seem possible to send the whole MQRFH2/usr folder in a monitoring event.
| Code: |
<p:applicationDataQuery>
<p:complexContent p:name="something">
<p:payloadQuery p:queryText="$Root/MQRFH2/usr"/>
</p:complexContent>
</p:applicationDataQuery> |
This does not send anything. Maybe it has something to do with this?
Do you need to create a complexContent element for each usr field separately?
I haven't tested yet if you can do even that.
I'm running 8.0.0.1
moderators, please move this to Message Broker forum. I have no idea how I managed to post it here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
So moved.
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:36 am Post subject: Re: RFH2 and monitoring profile |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| Esa wrote: |
Do you need to create a complexContent element for each usr field separately?
|
I should have written:
Do you need to create a simpleContent element for each usr field separately? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 5:51 am Post subject: Re: RFH2 and monitoring profile |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| Esa wrote: |
| Esa wrote: |
Do you need to create a complexContent element for each usr field separately?
|
I should have written:
Do you need to create a simpleContent element for each usr field separately? |
I would expect so. Because unless I am mistaken you can only capture fields in the event, not tree snippets. However you could run ASBITSTREAM on the tree snippets and send that information to the environment. I can then be retrieved as a field from the environment....
Have fun 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:01 am Post subject: Re: RFH2 and monitoring profile |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
Because unless I am mistaken you can only capture fields in the event, not tree snippets. However you could run ASBITSTREAM on the tree snippets and send that information to the environment. I can then be retrieved as a field from the environment....
|
I regret to say, but you are mistaken. You can emit structures with a complexContent definition.
For some reason I'm not able to emit even single fields from MQRHF2/usr with simpleContent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
Remember that under WMQv7 and higher, there's no such thing as an RFH2, just simulations of it within WMB. This may explain why WMB can't see a usr "folder" because it's a list of properties.
I'd raise a PMR. That APAR sounds connected but similar, and IMHO another PMR would either confirm you need that APAR or highlight there's an additional problem in this area.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
Sounds funny because the APAR says like this:
| APAR IC82100 wrote: |
In Monitoring profile, if the event payload section is
selected in order to add a simple field from MQRFH2 header (for
example: $Root/MQRFH2/usr/FILENAME), the generated event will
treat this data field as a complex data. The generated event
will have the field, extracted from the message, contained in
wmb:applicationData/wmb:complexContent field instead of
wmb:applicationData/wmb:simpleContent. |
I read this as like you can add data from MQRFH2/usr.
But maybe no RFH2 data is sent any more. That would in fact be a fix to the problem described in the APAR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| Esa wrote: |
| But maybe no RFH2 data is sent any more. That would in fact be a fix to the problem described in the APAR. |
Well there's an MQRFH2 parser in WMBv8 and the InfoCenter describes usr as a folder so you should be able to do what you're describing
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
It seems that you need to select 'Use MQRFH2 compact parser for MQRFH2 header' in the MQInput node. I made that change and the flow emitted the usr folder nicely.
Thanks, Vitor. Your link guided me to the right path. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Esa |
| Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Finland
|
| Worked with 8.0.0.2, not with 8.0.0.1... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
