| Author |
Message
|
| bkiran2020 |
 Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:00 am Post subject: channel max connection. |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 243
Location: US
|
How to find the max channel connection on the server.
I have tried the command
1)echo 'dis chs(*)' | runmqsc QMGR | grep
CONNAME| sort | uniq -c
but if has given some count like 400 but the max channel connection for the QMGR is 100 only.
but when i tried this command I have got some count like this.
2)echo 'dis chs(*)' | runmqsc QMGR | grep
CONNAME| grep | RUNNING sort | uniq -c
78
Could any one suggest which is the correct command ?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
| Join me in the 21st century and use a GUI like MO71. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| zpat wrote: |
| Join me in the 21st century and use a GUI like MO71. |
M071's GUI is circa 1993, not 21st century at all.
Use MS0P. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
Shame that the MQ explorer regularly freezes (for me at least) and has other unpleasant interface bugs (like the navigator pane blanking).
This is despite using the very latest versions of MQ and explorer and MBX available. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| zpat wrote: |
Shame that the MQ explorer regularly freezes (for me at least) and has other unpleasant interface bugs (like the navigator pane blanking).
This is despite using the very latest versions of MQ and explorer and MBX available. |
Yeah, there are bugs in the most recent level of MBX, particularly with Broker Toolkit also running.
It's also a shame that MO71 is not being maintained. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| pfarrel |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 16 Mar 2004
Posts: 120
Location: Kansas City
|
I have experienced hangs and loops in MQ/Explorer with the Broker plugin. The problem has turned out to be that I am running out of handles. This can be seen in a file named .log. On my windows system this file is in this directory:
C:\Documents and Settings\<userid>\IBM\WebSphereMQ\workspace\.metadata\
In the file named .log I will see this message:
org.eclipse.swt.SWTError: No more handles
IBM has sent me a new jar file which seems to have improved the situation. It is a new version of this file:
com.ibm.etools.wmadmin.broker.explorer_8.0.0.1.jar |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| pfarrel wrote: |
I have experienced hangs and loops in MQ/Explorer with the Broker plugin. The problem has turned out to be that I am running out of handles. This can be seen in a file named .log. On my windows system this file is in this directory:
C:\Documents and Settings\<userid>\IBM\WebSphereMQ\workspace\.metadata\
In the file named .log I will see this message:
org.eclipse.swt.SWTError: No more handles
IBM has sent me a new jar file which seems to have improved the situation. It is a new version of this file:
com.ibm.etools.wmadmin.broker.explorer_8.0.0.1.jar |
Yes, there are iFixes to the problems in the current release. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| It's also a shame that MO71 is not being maintained. |
Paul Clarke regularly updated it and has tested it with MQ 7.1 and 7.5.
So I don't see that it needs maintenance since it actually works brilliantly.
Eventually it might need some more, I assume that Mark E Taylor will be doing that.
I'll use that slow and buggy MQ explorer one day if I have to... 
It won't be a patch on the multi-QM display and other advanced features that MO71 has though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| zpat wrote: |
| I'll use that slow and buggy MQ explorer one day if I have to... |
Luddite!
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| RogerLacroix |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:34 pm Post subject: Re: channel max connection. |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada
|
| bkiran2020 wrote: |
| Could any one suggest which is the correct command ? |
Well, you have 78 running channels and 322 stale connections. How do you get stale connections? Easy. An application or thread exits but does not explicitly disconnect from the queue manager. I have noticed that Java/JMS programmers "assume" MQ will clean up after them, so them don't bother disconnecting from the queue manager.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bkiran2020 |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:34 pm Post subject: Re: channel max connection. |
|
|
Master
Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Posts: 243
Location: US
|
| RogerLacroix wrote: |
| bkiran2020 wrote: |
| Could any one suggest which is the correct command ? |
Well, you have 78 running channels and 322 stale connections. How do you get stale connections? Easy. An application or thread exits but does not explicitly disconnect from the queue manager. I have noticed that Java/JMS programmers "assume" MQ will clean up after them, so them don't bother disconnecting from the queue manager.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc. |
Thanks you ...
small doubt queue manger also have some max handle option what is the use of that |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| bruce2359 |
| Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:13 pm Post subject: Re: channel max connection. |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 9469
Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
| bkiran2020 wrote: |
| ... queue manger also have some max handle option what is the use of that |
Have you tried using google to search for an answer to your doubt?
_________________
I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
| zpat wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| It's also a shame that MO71 is not being maintained. |
Paul Clarke regularly updated it and has tested it with MQ 7.1 and 7.5.
So I don't see that it needs maintenance since it actually works brilliantly.
Eventually it might need some more, I assume that Mark E Taylor will be doing that.
I'll use that slow and buggy MQ explorer one day if I have to...
It won't be a patch on the multi-QM display and other advanced features that MO71 has though. |
There was the following post on the list server last week:
| Quote: |
Any word on IBM picking up where Paul left off on MO71?
I am running 7.5.0 and just tried an export on an Alias queue from a Queue List.
It isn’t picking up the base queue name when using MQSC or XML exports.
If you open the Alias queue then it exports everything just fine, so it seems to be only a problem with exporting from a Queue List.
|
MO71 probably works fine for 99.9% of things right now, but without Paul's TLC going forward....
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| zpat |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 19 May 2001
Posts: 5866
Location: UK
|
First thing - check the person is using the latest MO71 version.
Second thing - when exporting definitions from lists of objects - make sure the field name that you want exported is included in the list of field names being displayed. It won't export field values that are not being shown in the list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| And any assumptions about Mark E Taylor adding to his list of things to do is rather optimistic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
