ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » How would you design this?

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 How would you design this? « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
tso0rxp
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2003 6:57 am    Post subject: How would you design this? Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 07 Jan 2002
Posts: 85

Remote server (Win2K) needs to receive data real-time from Local server (Solaris) and process data when it arrives. Solaris running MQ Server v5.2. Win2K not running MQ.

Would you have an open client connection running on Win2K looking for messages in a local queue on Solaris? Would you install MQ Everyplace on Win2K server?

I could do a full MQ install on Win2K (with channels and xmit queues) but I'm looking for a lower cost alternative.
_________________
Bob Perry
MQ Administrator
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
RogerLacroix
PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Knight

Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 3264
Location: London, ON Canada

Well, if cost is your major concern, then WMQ client(s) is/are they way to go. WMQ client is free.

Make sure who ever writes the W2K WMQ application has had both previous experience writing WMQ code and experience with writing for a WMQ client situation.

Client channels (or SVRCONN) can be disconnected for a varity of reasons (the famous rc=2009). Therefore, the client application has to be able to handle these types of situations without exiting / abending. i.e. You need reconnection logic but at any level in the client application without losing data (internal to the appl.). The client application will need to handle disconnected channel for: connect, open, get, put, put1, close, and even commit & rollback.

In other words, at any point the client application attempts a WMQ API call, they need to be able to correctly handle a failure. (and NOT blame it on WMQ!!!!). This is especially true if you are working under a syncpoint (local or global).

later
Roger Lacroix
Enterprise Architect
Capitalware Inc.
_________________
Capitalware: Transforming tomorrow into today.
Connected to MQ!
Twitter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tso0rxp
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2003 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voyager

Joined: 07 Jan 2002
Posts: 85

Thank you, Roger.
_________________
Bob Perry
MQ Administrator
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » How would you design this?
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.