Author |
Message
|
bkiran2020 |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: distribution problem |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 20 Jan 2011 Posts: 243 Location: US
|
In distribution ,when destination Queue is filled Then where will be the msg will be go to the sender DLQ or destination DLQ?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
It goes to the place that the documentation says it will go. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bkiran2020 |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:06 am Post subject: distribution problem |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 20 Jan 2011 Posts: 243 Location: US
|
i have tried distribution using this scenior ...& iam nt able to find them in sender or receive Qmgr DLQ .....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:21 am Post subject: Re: distribution problem |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
bkiran2020 wrote: |
i have tried distribution using this scenior ...& iam nt able to find them in sender or receive Qmgr DLQ .....  |
And how do you know they should be in either place? _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bkiran2020 |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:43 am Post subject: Re: distribution problem |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 20 Jan 2011 Posts: 243 Location: US
|
Vitor wrote: |
bkiran2020 wrote: |
i have tried distribution using this scenior ...& iam nt able to find them in sender or receive Qmgr DLQ .....  |
And how do you know they should be in either place? |
i Just guess than it should be place in either in DLQ...afterward i have done simple example can see that the msg is none of DLQ.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:09 am Post subject: Re: distribution problem |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
bkiran2020 wrote: |
i Just guess |
Don't guess; know. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bkiran2020 |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:28 am Post subject: Re: distribution problem |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 20 Jan 2011 Posts: 243 Location: US
|
Vitor wrote: |
bkiran2020 wrote: |
i Just guess |
Don't guess; know. |
this time i observe that the msg in xmit queue are pilling up & the reciver channel is going paused status & coming back to the running status after the xmit queue is empty... please tell the ANSWER |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vitor |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:35 am Post subject: Re: distribution problem |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
|
bkiran2020 wrote: |
this time i observe that the msg in xmit queue are pilling up & the reciver channel is going paused status & coming back to the running status after the xmit queue is empty... please tell the ANSWER |
You see how easy it it without guesswork? Now you know the message is in the xmitq. You also know that the destination queue is full (from your OP) and that the channel has paused. That channel status results from a specific case; no valid destination. We know that the destination queue is invalid because it's full; so all you now need to determine is why the destination DLQ is not considered a valid target.
I'd guess the DLQ doesn't exist on the destination. Don't respond with "I have confirmed that the SYSTEM.DEAD.LETTER.QUEUE" exists. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Butcher |
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 1716
|
this works as designed (and as configured). read the intercommunication manual (and the others too). especially read aboutmessage retry on the channels. read about DLQ handling. read about DLQ configuration. _________________ Regards, Butcher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|