ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » multi-instance with load balance issue

Post new topic  This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
 multi-instance with load balance issue « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
KAKA123
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:26 am    Post subject: multi-instance with load balance issue Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 13

Hi experts,

I have one important question

If I setup multi-instance QM and our clients have versoin of MQ older than 7 and If I use load balance network. the load balance will point to the active instance QM server and if the server is fail then it will point to the other server, this is the normal way

My qustion is: If the network to server 1 lost (ex: cable unplugged) Is the QM will switch over to the other server or not because the load balance will point to the other server???

If you have any best solution please share me because I cant force our clients to upgrade their MQ to support multiple connection in the connection name of MQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

This is a question that has everything to do with how you set up the load balancer, and nothing to do with how you set up the queue manager.

So I don't think we can help.

If the load balancer has some way that the queue manager can signal it, then you can use MQ Service objects to run scripts that signal the load balancer when the queue manager starts and stops.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

Also think and use some common sense.
  • If the load balancer cannot access the qmgr, does that mean that the qmgr is not healthy?
  • If the qmgr is still healthy why should it fail over?


I think you are more looking towards an HA solution than a MI solution...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mqjeff
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

fjb_saper wrote:
I think you are more looking towards an HA solution than a MI solution...



MI is an HA solution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

mqjeff wrote:
fjb_saper wrote:
I think you are more looking towards an HA solution than a MI solution...



MI is an HA solution.

Doesn't treat network the same though does it?
Neither does it integrate multiple disparate and unrelated but loosely connected apps into a failover group...?

I know, it's all about how much money you can afford to spend ...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
KAKA123
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 13

fjb_saper wrote:
Also think and use some common sense.
  • If the load balancer cannot access the qmgr, does that mean that the qmgr is not healthy?

    No maybe there is a problem in network side

  • If the qmgr is still healthy why should it fail over?


It should fail over cous the load balancer point to the other instace server and this instance of QM should be active.

I think you are more looking towards an HA solution than a MI solution...


please explain more and advise me also
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
exerk
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jedi Council

Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Posts: 6339

This post looks suspiciously like THIS post. What don't you like about the answers here?
_________________
It's puzzling, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this before...and it's hard to soar like an eagle when you're surrounded by turkeys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mqjeff
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Master

Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447

Also, remember, that no matter what you THINK you want to do, you can not use any kind of network load balancer between MQ channels except for SVRCONN/CLNTCONN pairs.

So, if you mean that your 'clients' are actually 'business partner queue managers', then you can't use the F5 here.

At all. Under any circumstances, you can not put any kind of network load balancer between two queue managers. CAN NOT.

Do you listen, please? You CAN NOT PUT A NETWORK LOAD BALANCER BETWEEN TWO QUEUE MANAGERS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General IBM MQ Support » multi-instance with load balance issue
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.