|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
 |
|
Error 2035 on the users that have all needed rights |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
Author |
Message
|
jumping_frog |
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:36 am Post subject: Error 2035 on the users that have all needed rights |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 23 Feb 2012 Posts: 2
|
Hello,
I have got error 2035 from amqscnxc on the windows box. User that have run amqscnxc is a member of local group mqm and has all rights on the qmanager.
Here is a more detailed explanation.
I have installed MQ 7.1 on the standalone (local authentication and authorisation) windows 2003 box.
Then I have created Qmanager, Local/Remote Queues, Sender/Receiver/Server-connection channels and listener.
Connectivity with remote Qmanager have established successfully sender/receiver channel pairs are in the running state.
I was able to put data via MQExplorer to the queue and data was successfully transmitted to the corresponding queue on the remote queue manager.
That's why I have considered that installation is OK.
Than I want to test connectivity for applications application with amqscnxc but
while performing this test I have got error 2035
amqscnxc -x 10.0.10.254 -c SERVER.CHNL TEST
Sample AMQSCNXC start
Connecting to queue manager TEST
using the server connection channel SERVER.CHNL
on connection name 10.0.10.254.
MQCONNX ended with reason code 2035
It's very strange because user exists and is a member of the group mqm!
set | findstr USER
USERDOMAIN=MQ-SWIFT
USERNAME=mq_usr
user mq_usr has all needed priviledges on the qmanager TEST
dspmqaut.exe -p mq_usr -m TEST -t qmgr
Entity mq_usr has the following authorizations for object TEST:
inq
set
connect
altusr
crt
dlt
chg
dsp
setid
setall
ctrl
system
amqscnxc returns error 2035 also and for the user that can successfully connect to qmanager TEST via MQExplorer!
amqscnxc and MQExplorer was executed on the same box as Qmanager had been installed.
What's going wrong? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JasonE |
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 03 Nov 2003 Posts: 1220 Location: Hursley
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jumping_frog |
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Newbie
Joined: 23 Feb 2012 Posts: 2
|
Thank you for reply. You are right.
When I removed all profiles from Channel Authentication Records and just added all priviledges to the SRV-channel with mqaut at least local connection was established successfully. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqjeff |
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008 Posts: 17447
|
jumping_frog wrote: |
When I removed all profiles from Channel Authentication Records and just added all priviledges to the SRV-channel with mqaut at least local connection was established successfully. |
It would have been more secure to leave the default profiles alone, and add an additional profile that was specific to this channel. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bruce2359 |
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Poobah
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 9469 Location: US: west coast, almost. Otherwise, enroute.
|
mqjeff wrote: |
jumping_frog wrote: |
When I removed all profiles from Channel Authentication Records and just added all priviledges to the SRV-channel with mqaut at least local connection was established successfully. |
It would have been more secure to leave the default profiles alone, and add an additional profile that was specific to this channel. |
Best-practice dictates that you grant only those privileges that are required.
Your shotgun approach, while appearing to 'fix' the problem, merely opened up future problems, namely: future security exposures. _________________ I like deadlines. I like to wave as they pass by.
ב''ה
Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, Lex Vivendi. As we Worship, So we Believe, So we Live. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|