| Author |
Message
|
| Vitor |
 Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:27 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
I think luck is on my side this time the solaris 9 i am using is a 64 bit..  |
You've got a v5.3 queue manager on a 64-bit version of Solaris 9? 
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
or i would have to replace the kernal of that box..  |
No you wouldn't.
We keep telling you why.
You only hear what you want to.
But if you feel you're making progress then good for you.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| ankurlodhi |
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 266
|
ya .. I got a 5.3 queue manager on 64 bit solaris 9
but my manager wants me to make the channel manually and then put the channel tabel file.. 
how bad it can get. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| ya .. I got a 5.3 queue manager on 64 bit solaris 9 |
Interesting.
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| but my manager wants me to make the channel manually and then put the channel tabel file.. |
How's he going to spot the difference between a manually created channel & a scripted one? How do you you won't need to change the channel definitions anyway?
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| how bad it can get. |
A lot worse than this believe me. What you've been given here is a simple WMQ task.
Wait until you need to set up an overlapping cluster, or SSL, or find a lost message in a multi-queue manager estate.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ankurlodhi |
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 266
|
naah i am not going to change any channel definition, so I just created a channel with the same name and authority of mqm
and created a listener,
as i have never added the statement to the /etc/services for listener actually i dont know how to .. have to look for it how to do that.
but i am confussed that weather i should make an entry in the /etc services or make different listeners. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| naah i am not going to change any channel definition |
I hope it works
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| so I just created a channel with the same name and authority of mqm |
I hope your audit / security function don't find out.
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| created a listener, |
Good
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| as i have never added the statement to the /etc/services for listener actually i dont know how to .. have to look for it how to do that. |
That's going to be an interesting search. I hope the box admin's don't find out what you're up to.
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| but i am confussed that weather i should make an entry in the /etc services or make different listeners. |
I'm now leaning to the opinion this thread is a wind-up by an experienced WMQ person. Just too many of the old familiar newbie mistakes to be true, too many buttons being pushed, just slightly too bizare.... 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| ankurlodhi |
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 266
|
I found it.... ooh yes... !!
i think making a listener will be gud choice cause it will be easier to troubleshoot too as its mq ver 7.0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| gbaddeley |
| Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 2538
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
| I think luck is on my side this time the solaris 9 i am using is a 64 bit.. |
You've got a v5.3 queue manager on a 64-bit version of Solaris 9? |
AFAIK, it will work, but I doubt its supported by IBM, and 64 bit apps won't be able to call MQ because there are no 64 bit MQ libraries and all the MQ processes run as 32 bit.
_________________
Glenn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| gbaddeley wrote: |
| Vitor wrote: |
| You've got a v5.3 queue manager on a 64-bit version of Solaris 9? |
AFAIK, it will work, but I doubt its supported by IBM, and 64 bit apps won't be able to call MQ because there are no 64 bit MQ libraries and all the MQ processes run as 32 bit. |
Hence my surprise - it's unsupported and you have application problems.
I repeat my suspicion this thread is a wind-up.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| ankurlodhi wrote: |
I found it.... ooh yes... !!
i think making a listener will be gud choice cause it will be easier to troubleshoot too as its mq ver 7.0 |
Quite a mix and totally misleading. I thought he was talking about V 5.3 and not about V 7.0 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
