| Author |
Message
|
| Allan Mackay |
 Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:23 am Post subject: EmailOutputNode issue |
 |
|
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 29
|
Hi,
I'm having a slight issue with the EmailOutput Node in WMB6.1...
I have set no properties for the node itself, rather, I am setting them in a JavaCompute Node immediately prior to it. This works, I get my email, with correct subject, recipients etc. However, I also seem to get an exception which is resulting in a fail right back to the message flows input node which is then caught there.
The exception is a 4455 - "'No recipient email addresses found"!
How can that be when the email is successfully sent? It's almost as if the flow is sending the message twice, once using the properties set in the JavaCompute Node and then again using the properties of the EmailOutput Node...
What have I done wrong? Any ideas? I'm flumoxed!
Cheers 
-Al. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
Perhaps the addresses are in the CC or BCC sections rather than in the TO: part.?
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Allan Mackay |
| Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 29
|
| smdavies99 wrote: |
| Perhaps the addresses are in the CC or BCC sections rather than in the TO: part.? |
No, the 'TO:' part is definitely populated by the JavaCompute Node - born out by the fact that I do actually receive the emails with a 'TO' address... That's the odd thing, I do receive the emails yet still get an exception too  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| smdavies99 |
| Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Council
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 6076
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow this side of Never-never land.
|
Hmmm. My next step would probably to put a trace node inbetween the JCN & the EmailNode.
Then I'd import the sample flow and modify it with a trace node just before the EmailNode and compare the differences.
_________________
WMQ User since 1999
MQSI/WBI/WMB/'Thingy' User since 2002
Linux user since 1995
Every time you reinvent the wheel the more square it gets (anon). If in doubt think and investigate before you ask silly questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
| I'd check that you aren't managing to call propagate() twice from your JCN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Allan Mackay |
| Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 29
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| I'd check that you aren't managing to call propagate() twice from your JCN. |
No, definitely not. I've compared my flow with one that works and can see no difference. I am noticing that the failure is sporadic and am beginning to suspect that something else in the flow may be causing a corruption... so sometimes it works as expected and sometimes it doesn't. Weird that it's being reported as a failure to send due to no recipients though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqmatt |
| Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 04 Aug 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Hursley, UK
|
| Are you running with multiple thread instances? Might be a timing issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
