| Author |
Message
|
| WMBSAM |
 Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:02 pm Post subject: Timeoutcontrol node issue |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
|
I have question regarding timeoutcontrol node and timeout notification node.
I have a requirement where for every 15 minutes i have to make a webservice call if the call is success then i have to issue cancel action to the timout control node and if it is failure it has to retry the call for every 15 minutes for about 4 times(1hour)
I was able to achieve the above task but my question is during the time interval wen the retry process happens does the timoutcontrol node stores the message in the cache memory???
Becoz we have a huge number of message which has to follow this sequence and we cannot afford them to store in the memory
Any suggestions??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| balaji83it |
| Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 72
|
Hello,
You can afford the task since retry happens only when the webservice is down.
Also one suggestion which may be useful is
Why can't you use multiple timeoutcontrol nodes to balance the load?
Also you can handle the load from several messages by deploying the flow over several execution groups or brokers (running over a single system or multiple systems)as the load may be.
Thanks
Konijeti Balaji. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AkankshA |
| Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Singapore
|
The messages or rather requests gets stored in an MQ queue
SYSTEM.BROKER.TIMEOUT.QUEUE 
_________________
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WMBSAM |
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
|
| AkankshA wrote: |
The messages or rather requests gets stored in an MQ queue
SYSTEM.BROKER.TIMEOUT.QUEUE
|
Thanks Akanksha thanks a lot you made my day. The flow was completely done just waiting for the integration if the answer was negative then i thought for a redesign of the flow.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AkankshA |
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Singapore
|
| Quote: |
Thanks Akanksha thanks a lot you made my day. The flow was completely done just waiting for the integration if the answer was negative then i thought for a redesign of the flow.
|
_________________
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WMBSAM |
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
|
just thought to add an update for this don't you think it would have been better if broker had provided a facility where we can store the message in a user defined queue instead of SYSTEM.BROKER.TIMEOUT.QUEUE for the above said interval of time after which it can retry the request .
I had a thought becoz if there are a huge number of messages which have to go thru same process then we have a option of defining different queues in other timer nodes which will handle the load of huge number of messages
correct me if i am wrong!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WMBSAM |
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
|
| Thanks Jeff !!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| mqjeff |
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 17447
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WMBSAM |
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
|
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Thank mqmatt, not me. |
I guess it was you who replied ??
can i know how matt is related to this(No Offence)???  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fjb_saper |
| Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY
|
| WMBSAM wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Thank mqmatt, not me. |
I guess it was you who replied ??
can i know how matt is related to this(No Offence)??? |
Development team in Hursley, I guess... 
_________________
MQ & Broker admin |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| WMBSAM |
| Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Location: Atlanta
|
| fjb_saper wrote: |
| WMBSAM wrote: |
| mqjeff wrote: |
| Thank mqmatt, not me. |
I guess it was you who replied ??
can i know how matt is related to this(No Offence)??? |
Development team in Hursley, I guess... |
Thanks Matt!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
