ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » problem in removing deployed flows from the unix box

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 problem in removing deployed flows from the unix box « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
mega
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:33 am    Post subject: problem in removing deployed flows from the unix box Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

HI all,

i am facing an issue I am looking for your help. We use MQ V 5.3 and Message broker V 5. Normally for deploying message flows into the broker (which is in UNIX box) we use the configuration manager in windows.

Now the problem is, I deployed a flow via the config mgr the sender channel from config QM to the UNIX server was running thus the flow got deployed. However for some reasons sender channel from server QM to config mgr was not running as a result the config mgr did not receive any successful response from the server QM eventhough the flow has been deployed successfully.
So to resolve this I tried creating new sender channel from server QM to config QM (windows) after deleting the existing channel, after sometime this channel started automatically and I was able to see that in config mgr the flow which I deployed was not getting reflected instead it shows the older flow only. Now there are actually 2 flows (older one and the newly deployed one) running in the broker but config mgr shows only one. How to resolve this issue? Is it possible to remove all the flows deployed? Can any one help or direct me to the right place if this is not the right place to post?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

Moved to correct section, with a mental note to see if the section titles can be written more clearly.....
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

Search the forum for discussion on orphan flows and processes. This may assist.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

yup will try that too.. thanks anyways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

people have suggested 'remove deployed children' but will it work for the ghost flow too? i cant test it too as it in server i should not screw it up further.. suggetions please
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

mega wrote:
people have suggested 'remove deployed children' but will it work for the ghost flow too?


Probably not as the config mgr can't see it.

Use the various methods for orphaned processes

mega wrote:
i cant test it too as it in server


Well where else would it be?

mega wrote:
i should not screw it up further.. suggetions
please


Go for it. If it screws up, delete the broker, redefine the broker and redeploy from scratch.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

nice one.. but am talking about test servers which are being currently under testing by clients dude.. the flow is used by them as it is running in the broker but the problem will be in future while upgrading it as config mgr cant see it

well am trying to put manual message to system.broker.admin.queue to remove it as suggested in another thread... let me see if i can remove that as this was suggested to broker V6 and ours is V5...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

failed....

have to confirm if the xml format message to system.administrator.queue is accepted in broker V5...

can any one please confirm whether simple amqsput (a xml message) on the broker admin queue works in V5?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

mega wrote:
can any one please confirm whether simple amqsput (a xml message) on the broker admin queue works in V5?


You can certainly put a message on that queue with amqsput. You might find the default buffer size a bit restrictive, but that's easily fixed.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

thanks man... will try tomo..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

i tried sending message manually through amqsput and found that the xml message has reached as 10 messages(each line was red as 1 message)

let me know how to put teh following as a single message into admin queue?

<Broker>
<Broker label="ANT_BROKER" uuid="658cc217-0e01-0000-0080-a89b72340e05" version="1">
<Change>
<ExecutionGroup label="GROUP A" uuid="08efc517-0e01-0000-0080-a89b72340e05"/>
</Change>
<ExecutionGroup>
<ExecutionGroup label="GROUP A" uuid="08efc517-0e01-0000-0080-a89b72340e05"/>
<Delete>
<MessageFlow uuid="0ff1979b-1d01-0000-0080-9458d93d1a6b"/>
</Delete>
</ExecutionGroup>
</Broker>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vitor
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA

Type it as a single line or use something smarter than amqsput!
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mega
PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 11

hufff... simple

Right click remove deployed children worked

it removed the so called ghost flows

thanks for your replies vitor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » problem in removing deployed flows from the unix box
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.