Author |
Message
|
vennela |
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 9:39 am Post subject: [Solved]Profile not found error using fmcautil |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
I have two workflow systems.
I have a main workflow system (Where cleanup server and shced server are also running) and another system.
When I invoke the admin utility on the second system everything is fine. But if I try to connect to the first system it gives me the following error
"Profile not found. Not connected to any system. "
Can we connect to the first system using the second system's admin utility or can't we?
---
Venny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jmac |
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001 Posts: 3081 Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Venny:
The following is the syntax of the fmcautil command. I know in the past I have successfully used the -y parameter, and also the -g and -s parameters to do what you are asking.
However, this was probably back in the 3.1 days... I.E. I have not tried this lately, and my current configuration only has a single system.
Code: |
fmcautil -?
Usage: fmcautil [-option [argument] ... ]
The following options are valid:
-y string configuration identifier
-g string system group name
-s string system name
-u string userid
-p string password
-f force here
-r [string] record file
-b [string] playback file
-l [string] log file
-k keep |
_________________ John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ratan |
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 1245
|
john, What environment you were using to do it? I just tested what Venny wants to do and it gives the same error for me. I am on Win2000 environment.
I know, I have to be able to connect to any system within a group using fmcautil. ( fmcautil, s-System commands menu, c-connect). When I try to connect from one of the systems in the group to an other one, It gives me the error "FMC00124E - Profile or keyword in profile not found".
An error like this would make sense in a Unix enviroments, where the user fmc has to be a member of mqm and db2 groups, but in a windows environment as long as the user is logged in with admin previlages, it should not matter.
-Thnx Laze. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jmac |
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001 Posts: 3081 Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Laze:
Last time I did this I most likely did it in an NT environment. Of course I no longer have one of those, so I could not try it again now anyway.
Like I said originally, I did this quite some time ago, most likely under V3.1 _________________ John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
manoj |
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2002 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 30 Jan 2002 Posts: 237 Location: Virgina
|
This particular error was raised as a PMR . i donno whther the cotext of the error was same. IBM says they 've fixed these problem in one of the hot fixes for 3.3.0. _________________ -manoj |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ratan |
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2002 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 1245
|
Guess I should open a PMR with IBM. I am using version 332.
-Thnx Laze |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2002 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
We need to add "connect names" of the other system in the client connections page of the configuration. Once we do this we will be able to connect to the other system from the first system.
Thanks
---
Venny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ratan |
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2002 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 1245
|
Thanx Venny. With your suggestion I got rid of the "Profile not found Error", but ran into a new one. I get the following error when I try to connect to the other system using fmcautil. Is there any other setting that I need to modify.
- FMC00013E Communication error - Failing Action: Connect_to_QM, Reason Code: 2058, Failing Object: FMCQM2.
-Laze |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2002 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
That's the tricky part.
Primary : FMC FMCSYS FMCGRP FMCQM
Secondary: FMC1 FMCSYS1 FMCGRP FMCQM1
The connect name on FMC should be
FMCGRP FMCSYS FMCQM FMC
FMCGRP FMCSYS1 FMCQM FMC
On FMC1
FMCGRP FMCSYS FMCQM1 FMC
FMCGRP FMCSYS1 FMCQM1 FMC
Notice the QMGR names on both the configId's above.
This should get rid of it.
Regards
Venny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ratan |
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2002 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 1245
|
Venny,
I dont understand it. Why should I be giving the local QM name. That is not the QM where the SYSTEM is.
Let me give it a shot though.
-Laze |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ratan |
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2002 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand Master
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 1245
|
Venny,
It works now. I guess it is asking for the QM name with which it can communicate to the system. That definetly makes sense.
-Laze |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zaklum |
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 96 Location: Boca Raton
|
Venny,
I'm not quite understanding this. I have also defined two systems with a remote database:
Server1 --> Workflow server with default configuration FMC
Configuration/FMC/FMLConnectName=FMC.FMCGRP.FMCSYS,FMCQM
Server2 --> Workfow server2 with configuration FMC2
Configuration/FMC/FMLConnectName=FMC2.FMCGRP.FMCSYS2,FMCQM2
Server3 --> Oracle 9.2 runtime database
If I'm not mistaken, what your saying is that
Server1 --> Workflow server with default configuration FMC should have:
The connect name on FMC should be
Configuration/FMC/FMLConnectName=
FMCGRP FMCSYS FMCQM FMC
FMCGRP FMCSYS1 FMCQM FMC
instead of
Configuration/FMC/FMLConnectName=FMC.FMCGRP.FMCSYS,FMCQM
and Server2 --> Workflow server with configuration FMC2 should have:
Configuration/FMC/FMLConnectName=
FMCGRP FMCSYS FMCQM2 FMC
FMCGRP FMCSYS2 FMCQM2 FMC
instead of
Configuration/FMC/FMLConnectName=FMC2.FMCGRP.FMCSYS2,FMCQM2
Please explain, since I'm having the same issue:
FMC00013E Communication error - Failing Action: Connect_to_QM, Reason Code: 2058, Failing Object: FMCQM2.
Regards,
zaklum |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zaklum |
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 96 Location: Boca Raton
|
I'm also gettin this error when I try to start the admin server
FMC12070E No administration server 'ADMINSVR' defined for system 'FMCSYS2' in database
Can someone help please
-zaklum |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jmac |
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001 Posts: 3081 Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Did you define an ADMIN server?
If not, why not.
Have you checked fmcsys.log and fmcerr.log? _________________ John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zaklum |
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 Posts: 96 Location: Boca Raton
|
John, aparently not. Here is the output of the sys and error files:
fmc@ap0220:/var/fmc/cfgs/FMC2/log #> more fmcsys.log
-----------------------------
11/22/05 11:24:44 FMC12070E No administration server 'ADMINSVR' defined for system 'FMCSYS2' in database.
fmc@ap0220:/var/fmc/cfgs/FMC2/log #> more fmcerr.log
WebSphere MQ Workflow 3.5 Error Report
Report creation = 11/22/05 11:24:44
Related message = FMC12070E No administration server 'ADMINSVR' defined for system 'FMCSYS2' in database.
Error location = File=/projects/fmc/drv2/lbld/v350/aix/src/fmcaarr.cxx, Line=892, Function=FmcAdminReqRouter::FetchSet
tings(const FmcString &, const FmcString &)
Error data = FmcExtException, MsgID=12070, MsgParam=ADMINSVR, FMCSYS2, FMCGRP, , , , ,
The issue over here is that I didnt' create the database. It was created remotely by the Oracle DBA. I don't know at what point we need to define this. Please explain!
Thanks for your help
-Zaklum |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|