| Author |
Message
|
| masteringmq |
 Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Posts: 200
|
| I check and everything is ok. Result is the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| masteringmq wrote: |
| I check and everything is ok. |
Then there are 2 possibilities:
1. You've missed something, everything is not ok and it's forcing these messages to be addressed to a single queue.
2. You've found a bug in the workload balancing for which a PMR should be raised.
Double check your configuration, especially the putting application (don't take the developer's word for the options being used!) and if you're still happy everything's set up as indicated in the documentation and as annotated in previous posts contact IBM and get a defect raised.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
| Vitor wrote: |
| Double check your configuration, especially the putting application (don't take the developer's word for the options being used!) |
Test it yourself using the sample program amqsput which does use the queue's default binding options.
If these are customer queues and you can't drop test messages in them you should have your own test queues in the cluster to test these types of things.
We are assumming that GTW is a Gateway QM into the cluster, and that the channels between GTW and LB1 and LB2 are happily functioning both ways.
Put Disable QL.RQST on GTW and try the test again.
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| masteringmq |
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Posts: 200
|
| The load balancing works. The messages goes to LB1 or LB2. That is after I disabled the QL.RQST in the GTW. However it would be nice to have the messages go to either GTW:QL.RQST or LB1:QL.RQST or LB2:QL.RQST. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
ALTER QLOCAL(QL.RQST) PUT(ENABLED) CLWLUSEQ(ANY)
and try the test again
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| masteringmq |
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 20 Oct 2008
Posts: 200
|
| Now all the messages goes to GTW: QL.RQST. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PeterPotkay |
| Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poobah
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 7722
|
| Vitor wrote: |
Then there are 2 possibilities:
1. You've missed something, everything is not ok and it's forcing these messages to be addressed to a single queue.
2. You've found a bug in the workload balancing for which a PMR should be raised.
|
_________________
Peter Potkay
Keep Calm and MQ On |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
