| Author |
Message
|
| steiner |
 Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:46 am Post subject: 2 Queue Managers on the same Platform |
 |
|
Voyager
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 89
|
Hello,
I have installed on my Windows 2003 Server MQSeries Version 6 with Refresh and Fix Pack.
I have configurated 2 Queue Managers, and I want to transfert datas from QMA a remote Queue to QMB a local Queue.
I have also configurated on QMA a transmission Queue and a Sender Channel
On QMB I have a Local Queue, and a Receiver Channel.
When I try to transfert the datas all the datas are blocked in the transmission Queue and I have an error AMQ 4061,
I have the same error if I disable the firewall.
Could someone explain me the basics Objects to configure to have a transfert between two Queue Managers.
Thanks for your help , bye |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Vitor |
| Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:59 am Post subject: Re: 2 Queue Managers on the same Platform |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| steiner wrote: |
Could someone explain me the basics Objects to configure to have a transfert between two Queue Managers.
|
The one's you've named I'm afraid. You don't mention a listener object on QMB, which is the only ommission I notice.
If you do have a listener, then you have a configuration problem somewhere. Check all the channel settings, that the listener on QMB is running, etc, etc.
The Intercommunication manual may provide additional, useful detail.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| steiner |
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:02 am Post subject: Re: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 89
|
Hello
Thanks for you answer.
I have checked all my configuration but i think all my parameters are corrects.
In my sender channel I have the @IP from the other Queue Manager and port 1414 and with the Transmission Queue from the first Queue Manager.
Do you have another Idea
Thanks, bye |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
Each queue manager needs it's own listener.
Which means each listener needs it's own port #.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| steiner |
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:38 am Post subject: Re |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 89
|
Hello,
thanks for your answer. But perhaps can you explain me witch MQ Objects must be programmed between two Queues Managers to transfert Datas from a Remote Queue into another Local Queue from the second Queue Manager.
Must it be configured on the first Queue Manager:
a remote queue
a sender channel
a listener
a receiver channel
a transmission queue
....
On the second Queue Manager :
a receiver channel
a local Queue
a listener
....
I must just know the basics objects they must be configured to make datas transfert.
In advance lot of thanks.
bye. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:51 am Post subject: Re: Re |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| steiner wrote: |
I must just know the basics objects they must be configured to make datas transfert.
|
I repeat my recommendation of the Intercommunication manual, which explains all this. With diagrams.
For simplicity, you should have a listener on each queue manager, and create the sender/receiver/xmitq set on both sides. If you do this as a standard on all queue managers, then it doesn't matter what way the data's flowing.
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| fschofer |
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Knight
Joined: 02 Jul 2001
Posts: 524
Location: Mainz, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Vitor |
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand High Poobah
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 26093
Location: Texas, USA
|
| fschofer wrote: |
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp0021.html?Open
|
Excellent additional resource! 
_________________
Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| AkankshA |
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: Re: Re |
|
|
Grand Master
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Singapore
|
first Queue Manager:
a remote queue definition
a sender channel
a listener
a transmission queue
....
On the second Queue Manager :
a receiver channel
a local Queue
a listener
....
_________________
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
