I think he got it "working" by statically linking all the client libraries with his application. This is the same, from a technological standpoint, as doing a client installation with the disadvantage you can't update the client without re-releasing the application.
Does anyone tried this in .net environment.Anyway iam going to try that way.And thanks very much for all your replies.
Last edited by san3297 on Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:40 pm; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 11 Nov 2005 Posts: 26093 Location: Texas, USA
san3297 wrote:
Adding all of the dlls from bin of mq to application is not a optimal solution i think.
I think you're right. You'd be better off with the flying monkeys.
san3297 wrote:
Anyway i am trying to do that way and will inform company to in advance.
I admire your determination to reach your desired but non-optimal solution. _________________ Honesty is the best policy.
Insanity is the best defence.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum