ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » variable length message

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 variable length message « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
WBI_user
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:21 pm    Post subject: variable length message Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 07 Aug 2001
Posts: 386

I have a message like
headerRecord1Record2Record3...Record9
The headers is fixed length 350 bytes. The Record1 to Record9 are fixed length but not the same.(i.e. Record1 is 280 and Reocrd2 is 340...). Each record type can occur 0 to N times.(i.e. the smallest message is just the header and the largest message can be up to header + Reord1xN + Record2 xN and so on. What 's the best way t model this message ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

There may not be more than one way to model this message.

You haven't provided enough information to tell.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WBI_user
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 07 Aug 2001
Posts: 386

I have modeled this message before in V21 using MRM. V21 does not support repeat Record that does not exists. So basically I have to insert dummy record for records that does not exists and also add repeat counts for every record type that repeats (i.e. record repeats 1 - N times instead of 0 to N times). But things has changed since V21. SO I am looking for other ways (or best practice) to handle this type of message.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

TDS in 2.1 could handle this message, if there's enough information in the message for TDS can handle this message.

CWF, even in 2.1, could handle this message, if there's enough information in the message for CWF to handle this message.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WBI_user
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 07 Aug 2001
Posts: 386

The only additional information is there is an record ID for each record type.
Here is an example of the message (much simplified).
HEADER 5 BYTES - HD001
RECORD1 6 bYTES - R1AAAA (can repeat 0 - N times)
RECORD2 7 bYTES - R1BBBBB (can repeat 0 - N times)

So a message can be
HD001 OR
HD001R1AAAAR2BBBBB OR
HD001R1AAAAR1AAAA...R2BBBBB.... (There is no information on how many repeats until you scan the message)

I tried a MRM CWF definition
HEADER Fixed length 5 bytes
RECORD1 Fixed length 6 bytes ( minoccurs 0, maxoccurs -1)
RECORD2 Fixed length 7 bytes ( minoccurs 0, maxoccurs -1)

The parser will fail with message tooo short if the message is missing Record1 or it'll map the data wrong because it does not know if the data is Record1 or record2.

I guess I should change my question to how to handle repeating record which may not occur.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jefflowrey
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand Poobah

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981

is the Record ID for each type a) fixed, and b) different for each type... that is, does it uniquely identify RECORD1 or RECORD2?

Then it's a tag, and you can do this as TDS tagged fixed-length. And could do it as tagged fixed-length in 2.1.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WBI_user
PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Partisan

Joined: 07 Aug 2001
Posts: 386

Thanks, I'll do it in TDS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
christian witschel
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apprentice

Joined: 07 Dec 2005
Posts: 27

let me guess you are trying to parse / create SAP Struktures?
Because that is typical SAP behaviour to have the strukture name at the beginning and then the values.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

christian witschel wrote:
let me guess you are trying to parse / create SAP Struktures?
Because that is typical SAP behaviour to have the strukture name at the beginning and then the values.


In that case you should be using the IDOC parser...
_________________
MQ & Broker admin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support » variable length message
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.