| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
  |
|
| ConfigMgr Design |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| Monk |
 Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:24 am Post subject: ConfigMgr Design |
 |
|
Master
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282
|
Hi All,
Machine 1 : Runs Toolkit
Machine 2 : ConfigMgr1 and Broker1
Machine 3 : ConfigMgr1 and Broker1
Now I can access the Configuration managers on both Machine 2 and Machine 3 using Machine 1 in the toolkit and creating a new domain.
Is this a best practice?
_________________
Thimk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
It's a common practice.
If both configmgrs are using the same user repository, then it's redundant. If they aren't, then it's necessary.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Monk |
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Master
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 282
|
thanx for the reply ...
Now if I have the following configuration...
Machine 1 : Runs Toolkit and ConfigMgr1
Machine 2 : Broker1
Machine 3 : Broker2
Broker1 and Broker2 are connected to ConfigMgr1 thru MQ.
Is this better than the previous one.?
Is this the best practice?.
_________________
Thimk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jefflowrey |
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 19981
|
I guess best practice is to do what is correct for your situation.
If you're going to put ConfigMgr on a separate machine, it make some sense to throw Toolkit on there as well - it makes it easier to do things like register new brokers.
But I would never expect any broker deployment to only have Toolkit on a single machine.
It's equally valid to run one configmgr per broker as it is to run one configmgr per larger environment (dev, test, production).
It may be necessary, because of user registries, to run more than one configmgr per environment.
It may be redundant, because of user registries, to run one configmgr per broker. It's not wrong to do so, even if it's redundant.
_________________
I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
