Author |
Message
|
ramangoel |
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject: Msg Flow Deployed Successfully But not showing up in the EG |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
I have created one Execution Group in the Broker Toolkit and tried to deploy a Message FLow, it successfully shows the message from the Config Manger but the flow is not showing up in the Execution Group.
I have checked Event Logs, nothing is there and even I have checked user.logs file on the AIX server on which broker is there but it is not getting updated with the latest information.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Raman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vk |
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 302 Location: Houston
|
Hi Raman,
Are the channels between the broker and configuration manager running? If the channels (both way) are not running, then you will not get any successful messages in the event log and the deployed components will not show under the execution group.
If the channels are running, then are you getting a deployment timeout error after sometime? This can happen if the size of the BAR file is huge. In this case try increasing the timeout value.
Regards,
VK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
Hi VK,
The channels are up and running, I am not even getting any timeout error also.
Thanks,
Raman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
Can someone please help!!!?
I have almost tried everything(checking channels:Running,EventLogs: nothing there, User.logs: nothing significant, increased heap size on the broker server: 2GB) to my knowledge.
Nothing is happening...
I really appreciate your help. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fjb_saper |
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Grand High Poobah
Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 20756 Location: LI,NY
|
Is the broker's DB accessible?
Are there any errors in the broker's log? _________________ MQ & Broker admin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
I tried to connect the DB and it is successfully connecting.
I could not find any error in the logs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vk |
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 302 Location: Houston
|
Do you see any messages piling up in the SYSTEM.BROKER.ADMIN.QUEUE? All deployment requests from the Configuration Manager are initially put into this queue before they are processed by the broker. If there is a pending deployment, then all further deployment requests start piling up in this queue.
Try doing a 'Cancel Deployment' by doing a right click on the Broker from the Toolkit. Then retry the deployment after making sure that there are no messages in the SYSTEM.BROKER.ADMIN.QUEUE.
Regards,
VK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
There were 90 odd messages in "SYSTEM.BROKER.ADMIN.QUEUE" queue.I deleted all the messages and then did fresh deployment.
Again the same successful message and one message count shows in the SYSTEM.BROKER.ADMIN.QUEUE. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
Broker is not running properly, then.
Did you start it? Did it put any errors in the log during startup? _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
I restarted the Broker. I got the following from the user.log file.
I am not sure if this is some error or successful message.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jun 14 10:18:29 chw-dcxnapp-004 user:info WebSphere Broker v6003[471074]: (BRKD0
1)[1]BIP2001I: The WebSphere Message Brokers service has started at version 6003
; process ID 286970. : BRKD01.service: /build/S600_P/src/AdminAgent/ControlProce
ss/rios_aix_4/ImbControlService.cpp: 338: ImbControlService::StartNewAA: :
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
You should look at every entry that Message Broker produces in that file. The line you showed is basically the first one, that Broker has umm started starting up.
Usually the last one that shows up says that Pub/Sub recovery has completed, or some such. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
This was the last line only from the logs.
I am not using Pub/Sub, so I did not install it during Broker installation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
It doesn't matter if you're using it or not - and I don't understand what you mean by "you did not install it".
It seems like your broker is not starting up correctly. You should see at least one more line, indicating that an EG has been started.
You probably need to open a PMR, unless this is a new installation. If it's a new installation, then you should start over. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ramangoel |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Posts: 19
|
I mean I did not install "User Name Server" during installation that corresponds to the Pub/Sub.
This is the fresh installation.
Thanks for your help! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jefflowrey |
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grand Poobah
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 19981
|
User Name Server only provides pub/sub security, not the core Pub/Sub functionality.
I've had issues in the past with installs that didn't have UNS installed. It's better to install it, and just never configure it.
If nothing else, it means you don't have to do any installs if you decide you need it later. _________________ I am *not* the model of the modern major general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|