| |
|
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support
|
RSS Feed - Message Broker Support
|
| How to point a Web Client to different MQ WF Servers? |
« View previous topic :: View next topic » |
| Author |
Message
|
| hos |
 Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Chevalier
Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Posts: 470
|
Spidy,
there is something wrong with your story.
If you have a single system group you must also have a single RTDB.
Basically Vanella's approach is correct, except that the Java API in MQWF 3.6 does no longer depend on channel tables.
Your Logon page must be able to enter the system name and your client code must use this name in the logon2() call. You can define multiple configurationIDs, define a mapping to the same system group name, but use different system names in the different connect name definitions.
Note that the Java API does not support multiple connect names in a single configurationID. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| spidy |
| Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 50
|
Hello All,
Yes indeed I was wrong somewhere in my story. Let me correct few things here.
We have 3 different WF Servers setup on 3 different environments.
Hence, all 3 WF Severs have its own independant SYSTEM GROUP, SYSTEM, QMGR AND RTDB.
BUT, the names of SYSTEM GROUP, SYSTEM AND Q MGR of all 3 WF Servers are same. I was confused there. Its NOT that they are having same SYSTEM GROUP.
And what we want to do is have a single WebClient pointing to these multiple configurations.
Is that possible? If yes, HOW?
Maybe, you guys have answered in previous posts, but then information from my side was bit wrong. So, i am asking again.
Thanks in advance to all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| vennela |
| Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 4055
Location: Hyderabad, India
|
| This cannot be achieved with just configuration. You ned to write some code to do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| hos |
| Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chevalier
Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Posts: 470
|
Hi,
it is probably not a great idea to use the same names for different resources javascript:emoticon(' ')
From MQ point of view: I don't think, that you can have queue manages with the same name in an MQ cluster.
From MQWF point of view: the multiple system group support feature of the Webclient is based on a unique mapping of configurationIDs to system group names.
From an end user point of view: how would I know the MQWF server that I am connected to, if all system groups are having the same name? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| spidy |
| Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 50
|
| hos wrote: |
| From MQ point of view: I don't think, that you can have queue manages with the same name in an MQ cluster. |
The 3 WF Servers are on different environments and the Q Mgrs of these are not in cluster with each other.
But, about the MQWF and end user point of view, you are right. I guess there has to be different system group names.
Thankyou all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
