ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support » Future in MQ series

Post new topic  Reply to topic
 Future in MQ series « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Chandra Mohan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:38 pm    Post subject: Future in MQ series Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 53

What would be the future of MQ series

Could any one of you let me know wat wud be the future in MQ series as i just started MQ administration prior to that I worked as a sys. admin. for Sun Solaris. I will really appreciate if some one from you will guide how to move forward for MQ.
_________________
Chandra Mohan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
paulgroo
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:18 am    Post subject: Hiya Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Ireland

With the Sun Solaris admin work and now the MQ stuff, it looks like you're on the right track for a Middleware role. Try and have a look at the Application Server aswell. It seems that a lot of places run MQ and Application Server on Unix platform. We've started using the MQ Workflow and Broker systems aswell now although I have a fair bit knowledge to gain before I could say I was competent with them.
It looks like IBM are trying to cross MQSeries with the Application Server more and more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
mvic
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject: Re: Hiya Reply with quote

Jedi

Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080

paulgroo wrote:
It looks like IBM are trying to cross MQSeries with the Application Server more and more.

I don't know the reasons why you say this. But note, for WAS v6, there was new code added to it, so it could do messaging without MQ. This means you don't need MQ if you are just doing messaging within WAS. If you still need to do messaging from WAS into an existing MQ system, you still need MQ (obviously).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulgroo
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:19 am    Post subject: Quite true... Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Ireland

I know what you mean, but I was thinking more from the MQSeries side of things. With each new release, they seem to be including more and more Java components. With version 6, they're using Eclipse which looks like they're providing more compatibility with Java application development.
I'm not a developer though but that looks like the direction they're heading?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
mvic
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:29 am    Post subject: Re: Quite true... Reply with quote

Jedi

Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 2080

paulgroo wrote:
I know what you mean, but I was thinking more from the MQSeries side of things. With each new release, they seem to be including more and more Java components. With version 6, they're using Eclipse which looks like they're providing more compatibility with Java application development.
I'm not a developer though but that looks like the direction they're heading?

I understand a bit better now. However, as far as I am aware, the Eclipse-based approach is being used only for MQ system administration. I think providing Java-based admin tooling is one thing, but "integration" (whatever that means in this context) with WAS is another thing altogether. Indeed one could argue that for WAS v6, MQ is less integrated with WAS, although of course it is still possible to use MQ from WAS v6.

(And for those who prefer command-line tooling rather than GUI - including me - there's still good old runmqsc)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paulgroo
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:47 am    Post subject: Commandline... Reply with quote

Centurion

Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: Ireland

I agree. Commandline is the way forward...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Chandra Mohan
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Hiya Reply with quote

Acolyte

Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 53

paulgroo wrote:
With the Sun Solaris admin work and now the MQ stuff, it looks like you're on the right track for a Middleware role. Try and have a look at the Application Server aswell. It seems that a lot of places run MQ and Application Server on Unix platform. We've started using the MQ Workflow and Broker systems aswell now although I have a fair bit knowledge to gain before I could say I was competent with them.
It looks like IBM are trying to cross MQSeries with the Application Server more and more.


Thanks for your update guys.

_________________
Chandra Mohan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

MQSeries.net Forum Index » IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support » Future in MQ series
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.