Author |
Message
|
leo.yue |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:41 am Post subject: how to set trigger on Server/Requester channel? |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 52
|
how to set trigger on Server/Requester channel? Thanks a lot.
Last edited by leo.yue on Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Butcher |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 1716
|
please read the intercommunication guide, chapter "triggering channels" _________________ Regards, Butcher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veturir |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Newbie
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 Posts: 5
|
thanks butcher _________________ veturir |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
leo.yue |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 52
|
Butcher, thanks a lot.
I knew it. For Sender/Receiver channel, it works.
For Server/Requester channel, transmission queue is on the Server side. The Server side sends messages to the Requester side from the transmission queue.
Requester side can start the channel, and then receive message from Server side.
btw, I wrote wrong title. It should be "how to set trigger on Server/Requester channel", not "how to set trigger on Server/Receiver channel" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Butcher |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 1716
|
is this still a question? _________________ Regards, Butcher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oz1ccg |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Yatiri
Joined: 10 Feb 2002 Posts: 628 Location: Denmark
|
BTW: Why not use the SERVER/REQUESTER combination ?
This allows your to start the channel manuel from both ends, and have the triggered start from the SENDER end..
And to make the triggering more stable (in case of network problems) adjust the TRIGINT to a resonable value.
-- Lock it or Lose it --  _________________ Regards, Jørgen
Home of BlockIP2, the last free MQ Security exit ver. 3.00
Cert. on WMQ, WBIMB, SWIFT. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
leo.yue |
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 52
|
Yes. I just used SERVER/REQUESTER combination.
But Only requester side can start channel because there is no visible IP address outside in requester side. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Butcher |
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Padawan
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 1716
|
If you have SERVER REQUESTER Channel then
- you can start the channel by starting the SERVER channel manually
- you can start the channel by starting the REQUESTER channel manually
- you can start the channel by tringgering the SERVER channel
(assuming you filled in the conname in both channels) _________________ Regards, Butcher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
leo.yue |
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 20 Oct 2004 Posts: 52
|
thanks.
But the problem is that requester side is behind the internet and it have no visible internet IP address.
There is visible internet IP address in the sever side. So we can set conname in the requester side and can not set conname in the server side. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
artrod |
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 Posts: 23
|
leo.yue wrote: |
thanks.
But the problem is that requester side is behind the internet and it have no visible internet IP address.
There is visible internet IP address in the sever side. So we can set conname in the requester side and can not set conname in the server side. |
I don't know if you resolved your issue yet, but with your current channel setup your only choice is to start the channel from the requestor side. Remember that the purpose of the requestor channel is to allow the receiving(requesting) application to start the channel when it is ready to receive messages, so the assumption here is that your app is waiting for messages whenever the channel is active. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|