Author |
Message
|
rajaram |
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:00 am Post subject: differences between ICS and MB |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Posts: 53
|
Hi All,
I am working on ICS and looks like it does the same functinality as that of Message Broker. Can some one tell me the differences between these two like when we use MB and when we use ICS. If some one already raised this question, pls provide me with the link.
Thank you, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:05 pm Post subject: Re: differences between ICS and MB |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
rajaram wrote: |
Hi All,
I am working on ICS and looks like it does the same functinality as that of Message Broker. Can some one tell me the differences between these two like when we use MB and when we use ICS. If some one already raised this question, pls provide me with the link.
Thank you, |
If you are using ICS, why do you want to move to MB |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqmaniac |
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 27 Dec 2005 Posts: 201
|
Integration adapters can be used with WAS,MB or ICS.
There is not much of a diffrence among these with any adapters.
I am working with crossworlds adapters and with MB,
The adapters and Connectors simply run on the Installed files and need not be deployed to any brokers.
I think,If you have ICS,You do not need to do anything if you are moving to MB,simply start the adapter as a stand alone service.
Hope this helps you a little |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RocknRambo |
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Partisan
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 Posts: 355
|
ICS and MB are both Integration Brokers, Ideally both can be used for Business Integration.
But there are some specific functionality for each brokers. even though byworkaround, can be achieved by either ones.
But philosocial debate raises as - ICS is for Synchronous Mode of Communication whereas MB is for ASynchronous.
If your Hub is expecting a high volume and huge messages, Fire & forget mode....MB shud be the right choice.
this might give some startup..
-RR |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rajaram |
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Acolyte
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Posts: 53
|
Thanks so much for the valuable info provided. Actually, I just wanted to know the differences and i dont want to shift to MB for the current project.
Thanks again,
Raja |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djeripo |
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 225
|
mqmaniac wrote:
Quote: |
I think,If you have ICS,You do not need to do anything if you are moving to MB,simply start the adapter as a stand alone service. |
Hope ,Its as simple as you said.But the truth is other way. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mqmaniac |
Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Master
Joined: 27 Dec 2005 Posts: 201
|
we installed the IBM Proprietary Connector and ODA and configured the Adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
mqmaniac wrote: |
we installed the IBM Proprietary Connector and ODA and configured the Adapter. |
OK......
So ....... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
emiddleware |
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 6:38 pm Post subject: Diff b/w MB and ICS |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 120
|
Hi ,
There is one more point I would like to add on to the difference b/w ICS and MB.
We can use MB for routing purposes . For example , if I want to route data to some other server it can be done .This can be achieved thru route and label nodes . But we cant achieve using ICS. _________________ Best Regards,
E-MiddleWare |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kram |
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 87
|
i do think ICS can route messages . _________________ Regards,
Ram |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
emiddleware |
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 03 Apr 2006 Posts: 120
|
Can you tell me how messages can be routed in ICS .. In MB, we can use route to and label nodes .. How come in ICS ?? _________________ Best Regards,
E-MiddleWare |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kram |
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 87
|
you can use a router collab and dynamically call subcollabs depending on the message header...
RocknRambo
Quote: |
But there are some specific functionality for each brokers. even though byworkaround, can be achieved by either ones. |
_________________ Regards,
Ram |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prapz |
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:19 am Post subject: Re: differences between ICS and MB |
|
|
Novice
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 Posts: 10
|
vennela wrote: |
rajaram wrote: |
Hi All,
I am working on ICS and looks like it does the same functinality as that of Message Broker. Can some one tell me the differences between these two like when we use MB and when we use ICS. If some one already raised this question, pls provide me with the link.
Thank you, |
If you are using ICS, why do you want to move to MB |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vennela |
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Jedi Knight
Joined: 11 Aug 2002 Posts: 4055 Location: Hyderabad, India
|
I deleted the content in that post. It had abusive language. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kram |
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Voyager
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 87
|
Thanks, i had comments written for him .. but had to delete my post since the comments written by him were deleted. _________________ Regards,
Ram |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|