ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » Connecting two queuemanagers of same name

Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2
 Connecting two queuemanagers of same name « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
fjb_saper
PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grand High Poobah

Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 20756
Location: LI,NY

vzboy wrote:
gyus... got this thing to work.. ..

atlast the qmgr alias did the trick.....

this forum is really a treasure chest.... thanks guys


Yes aliasing the qmgrs does the trick of giving them a unique name in the network. However it is still a bad design decision....

Enjoy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
catweazlefan
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbie

Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 7
Location: South of England

I would concur with the guys that advise against having the same QMGR name more than once in the network.

In addiition to the comments already made, I would add that to have potentially hundreds of QMGRs in a network that could talk to any one or all of the others (ignoring clustering) you would have a logistic nightmare.

e.g You have set up the (Z/os) default CSQ1 on three servers, MVS1, MVS2, MVS3. When you try to connect any two of them, the simplest naming convention is <sdr-qmgr>.<rcv-qmgr>, so this would give you
a sender channel of CSQ1.CSQ1 and a receiver channel called CSQ1.CSQ1, which wont be unique. You could argue that by using the server name , you could have a sender of MVS1CSQ1.MVS2CSQ1 and and so on, but straight away you have 17 characters gone, so with a limit of 20 chars, you dont have much to play with , even if the convention failed to cause confusion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
vastare
PostPosted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Novice

Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 11
Location: India

Hello All,

Quote:
/
wschutz:

System 1: QMGR1:
def ql(QMGR2) usage(xmitq)
def chl(QMGR1.QMGR1) chltype(sdr) conname(...) xmitq(QMGR2)
def qr(SOMEQ) rname(SOMEQ) rqmname(QMGR2)

System 2: QMGR1:
def qr(QMGR2) rqmname(QMGR1)
def chl(QMGR1.QMGR1)

amqsput to SOMEQ QMGR1 (on system 1)


I thought it never works ...........But i am wrong

Its working: D

Really you r Cool...........

--------------------
Vastare
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2 Page 2 of 2

MQSeries.net Forum Index » General Discussion » Connecting two queuemanagers of same name
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.