| Author |
Message
|
| MQRR |
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:28 pm Post subject: [Solved]persistentWorkItem() MQWF 3.6 |
 |
|
Centurion
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 110
|
Is anyone having issues with the method persistentWorkItem in executionservice class. we are having problems in getting the workitem object after upgrading from 3.4 to 3.6.
the same code base is working fine with the 3.4 but not with with 3.6. We are planning to open a PMR with IBM but wanted to put a word out on here incase anyone had this issue with 3.6
MQRR
Last edited by MQRR on Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| jmac |
| Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
I have not experienced any problems with any of the persitentxxx methods
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQRR |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 110
|
Jmac,
on which environment are you running your workflow?is it windows or AIX..
MQRR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Currently all my work has been with windows systems... but I really think that a bug such as you are describing would have to be already known no matter what the platform.
You didn't indicate what the problem was, just that there is a problem... perhaps you could elaborate a little more.
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQRR |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 110
|
Jmac,
I was trying to pinpoint exact problem until now. There were many variations, so i was waiting to complete my test case and get to the point.
I have successful test case that proves following problem:
we have workitem id stored in the tables. And using
WorkItem workItem = requestContext.getExecutionService()
.persistentWorkItem("workitemid");
we get the workitem object. And now when i say
WorkItem.name() I get the name of the workitem without problem
and it also returns me the workitem id if i say
workItem.persistentOid() without problem.
But when i say
workItem.owner() it returns me empty string. This happens only on 3.6
I have tested this on AIX, but i guess it should not matter what platform it is as you said, but I will test it on windows too and see how it behaves.
If you are interested i can send you the test case that i have created.
MQRR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
I have reproduced your problem, and while I also think that this is a bug the workaround is pretty simple....
Put a
workItem.refresh() right after your call to persistent workitem.
If you do not open a PMR on this PLEASE let me know... becuase this bug should be reported.
It is actually really stranger than I originally thought if you get the name, then try for the owner it works for me... but if I go for the owner prior to the name the owner is null.... Weird
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQRR |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 110
|
Thanks for that jmac. I could go ahead and do that but i think there are too many places that may need changes and it may be advisable not to, since this is not on production box, we can wait for IBM to fix it. We did open a PMR on this.
Thanks,
MQRR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| jmac |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jedi Knight
Joined: 27 Jun 2001
Posts: 3081
Location: EmeriCon, LLC
|
Could you let me know what the response is on that PMR.
Thanks
_________________
John McDonald
RETIRED |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQRR |
| Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 110
|
| sure I will. And there is another issue with 3.6 with the process instances list. When you put sort order for a process instance list it does not return the instances in the list, it times out(it could be an oracle issue since it did not happen on windows with DB2). We had PMR for this too, and IBM was able to recreate this and is sending us a patch for this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| MQRR |
| Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Centurion
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 110
|
update:
IBM has recognized this as an issue and agreed to send a patch for this as soon as they fix it.
MQRR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
