| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
yalmasri
Replies: 7
Views: 8184
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:18 am Subject: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
Does the indicated app with this mysterious resource issue have its own clustered queues?
If yes, consider looking at the AMQSCLM program that ships with MQ.
I thought I could play with some b ... |
| Topic: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
yalmasri
Replies: 7
Views: 8184
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:47 pm Subject: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
| Is this a bad time of the year to ask? No thoughts? Message groups? Split cluster XmitQ? CCDT? |
| Topic: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
yalmasri
Replies: 7
Views: 8184
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 5:26 am Subject: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
What does this one app want?
A client of ours have a mesh of applications distributed across a couple of servers under a cluster. The indicated app is contending with other apps on certain resource ... |
| Topic: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
yalmasri
Replies: 7
Views: 8184
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 6:52 am Subject: Varying load on cluster members without CLWLWGHT |
| All the applications we have are OK with the default round-robin clustering algorithm except one, which needs special handling. Is there away to control traffic for this application only? |
| Topic: Workbench has not been created yet |
yalmasri
Replies: 2
Views: 4064
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:43 am Subject: Workbench has not been created yet |
| Wasn't an issue really. I closed the Toolkit and the exception disappeared. Opened the Toolkit again, still no trace of the exception... some temporary malfunctioning apparently. Hope this will save p ... |
| Topic: Workbench has not been created yet |
yalmasri
Replies: 2
Views: 4064
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:26 pm Subject: Workbench has not been created yet |
This is the exception FWIW
org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.ResourceException(null)[4]: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Workbench has not been created yet.
at org ... |
| Topic: Workbench has not been created yet |
yalmasri
Replies: 2
Views: 4064
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:46 am Subject: Workbench has not been created yet |
We've been using the Toolkit to build our deployables, and I'm trying now to explore our way when moving to command line.
Issuing a simple mqsicreatebar command always spits a truckload of
java.la ... |
| Topic: URL property of ComIbmWSRequestNode |
yalmasri
Replies: 2
Views: 2548
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:45 am Subject: URL property of ComIbmWSRequestNode |
| Or in other words, when retrieving deployed code, webServiceURL property of ComIbmSOAPRequest node can be found there, while respective URLSpecifier property for ComIbmWSRequest cannot. Is there a way ... |
| Topic: URL property of ComIbmWSRequestNode |
yalmasri
Replies: 2
Views: 2548
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:19 pm Subject: URL property of ComIbmWSRequestNode |
Any reason for why executing this shows the URL for ComIbmSOAPRequestNode but not for ComIbmWSRequestNode?
mqsireportproperties MYBROKER -o AllMessageFlows -e default -r |
| Topic: Need an advice on this topology |
yalmasri
Replies: 34
Views: 20660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 2:11 am Subject: Need an advice on this topology |
| No, I'm going to use mqsichangeproperties the same way you'll be using it when you want to change the memory settings for your 100-EGs Broker, and in all cases the broker all together need to be resta ... |
| Topic: Need an advice on this topology |
yalmasri
Replies: 34
Views: 20660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:52 pm Subject: Re: Need an advice on this topology |
| Additional Instances. How many threads can one process run on your O/S? I don't know. But what if 50 of your 700 message flows need additional instances set to 100. Now your process needs to run 50*10 ... |
| Topic: Need an advice on this topology |
yalmasri
Replies: 34
Views: 20660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:09 am Subject: Need an advice on this topology |
It's the least worst alternative to the terrible setup you've proposed.
All of the reasons you've been given for why your setup is bad explain exactly how this minor change I've suggested is better ... |
| Topic: Need an advice on this topology |
yalmasri
Replies: 34
Views: 20660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:09 am Subject: Need an advice on this topology |
| That said, you are trying to conserve the resources of the overhead of additional EGs, but compared to 700 flows, the overhead is not very big! So you're saving a penny, and possibly costing a dollar ... |
| Topic: Need an advice on this topology |
yalmasri
Replies: 34
Views: 20660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:44 am Subject: Need an advice on this topology |
| Even with four active nodes, there can easily be reasons why you'd need to restart all four of them, and having two EGs on each node really does allow you to stagger the restarts whilst still maintain ... |
| Topic: Need an advice on this topology |
yalmasri
Replies: 34
Views: 20660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:40 am Subject: Need an advice on this topology |
| With your design using clustering if you get misbehaving app sending bad messages it could send to all brokers so they could be taken down simultaneously with a restart time of 40mins I wouldn’t be ... |
