| Author |
Message |
 Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:25 pm Subject: Interesting problem |
| Thanks for all your help. I totally agree with all your points, but this is not an ideal world sometimes we inherit systems... and its me who would be called out at 0300... regardless of it being the ... |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:03 pm Subject: Interesting problem |
| Its never that simple.... Need to keep the order etc. |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:01 pm Subject: Interesting problem |
| I 'assumed' this was now performing like WMB, i.e. if you didn't have a BOQ defined, then it would put it on the DLQ? As am quite sure the return code is the same. That is why I may be getting confuse ... |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:55 am Subject: Interesting problem |
| Agreed, when I used to use WAS this was an inbuilt feature (well you could configure it to do what you wanted). But this is a stand-alone app, and I may want it not to get rid of the message. |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am Subject: Interesting problem |
MQRC_BACKOUT_THRESHOLD_REACHED
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmqv6/v6r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.mq.csqzaw.doc/uj21650_.htm |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:47 am Subject: Interesting problem |
| This is a standalone Java app running on various platforms. The code hasn't changed in years, only change is V6 jars. |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:46 am Subject: Interesting problem |
Vitor - Sorry you are quite correct, its been a very long day / week.
So am I getting really confused and there is not a problem?
The reason the message went on the DLQ (once we sorted out the ... |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:39 am Subject: Interesting problem |
So I think my question is:
1. Is this a new feature in the JMS that is supplied with WMQ v6 or has it always been there. If it is new, can some point me to the release notes that explains this diff ... |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:29 am Subject: Interesting problem |
| Yes you are quite right, I fully understand why it failed to be put to the dead-letter queue, but thats the point as I never thought that without explity coding backout/DLQ features within my code it ... |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:17 am Subject: Interesting problem |
| Also if I open up the com.ibm.mqjms.jar for v5 then there is no method for the deadLetter. So did I miss something in IBMs migration document for JMS? |
| Topic: Interesting problem |
venusboy
Replies: 30
Views: 29353
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:54 am Subject: Interesting problem |
Hello,
That has always been my assumation (with the native WMQ API), but maybe I mis-understand what is meant by the application responablity to code around it.
But I have just had an exception ... |
| Topic: WMQ v6 SSL – Java Client |
venusboy
Replies: 2
Views: 3300
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:24 am Subject: WMQ v6 SSL – Java Client |
The following APAR explains the issue:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=171&context=SSFKSJ&context=SSWHKB&dc=DB550&q1=IY79333&uid=swg1IY79333&loc=en_US&cs=utf ... |
| Topic: WMQ v6 SSL – Java Client |
venusboy
Replies: 2
Views: 3300
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:53 am Subject: WMQ v6 SSL – Java Client |
Actually I didn't fully read the first entry within the error message:
During the SSL handshake
So this would indicate that the cipher is not supported at the SSL Server side.
This would expl ... |
| Topic: WMQ v6 SSL – Java Client |
venusboy
Replies: 2
Views: 3300
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:45 am Subject: WMQ v6 SSL – Java Client |
Hello,
I have recently upgraded a Solaris 8 server from WMQv5 CSD10 to WMQv6.0.2.1. We have numerous Java clients connecting to WMQ using SSL that have been working fine in version 5.
However in ... |
| Topic: Clients using SSL on Win32 |
venusboy
Replies: 3
Views: 2863
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:50 am Subject: Clients using SSL on Win32 |
Jeff,
Thanks for you reply, but in honesty I don't really understand what you have said.
So what is the point of amqmcert -d and is there a method to assign this to another user.
Is there an ... |
