| Author |
Message |
 Topic: sendmail plugin - Properties |
tonym
Replies: 1
Views: 1856
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:08 am Subject: sendmail plugin - Properties |
The Sendmail plugin node has a set of properties (C, F, f, h and X) on the Sendmail pane. The documentation doesn't describe these - does anyone know what they are?
cheers
Tony |
| Topic: Debugging an ESQL flow (WBIMB csd04) |
tonym
Replies: 0
Views: 1471
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:50 am Subject: Debugging an ESQL flow (WBIMB csd04) |
I seem to have a problem when stepping thru esql. According to the manual, variables are updateable by right clicking and then selecting "Change Variable Value".
However, when within esql, the "Chan ... |
| Topic: qmgr aliases - inconsistent behaviour? |
tonym
Replies: 5
Views: 3953
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:39 pm Subject: qmgr aliases - inconsistent behaviour? |
Peter,
I'm talking about qmgr aliases, not remote queues |
| Topic: qmgr aliases - inconsistent behaviour? |
tonym
Replies: 5
Views: 3953
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu May 27, 2004 7:59 am Subject: qmgr aliases - inconsistent behaviour? |
Suppose I create a qmgr alias called INVOICES on a local queue manager.
I now run a local application which opens QX@INVOICES. The local queue manager will resolve the qmgr alias and send the messa ... |
| Topic: aggregation and control messages in wbimb |
tonym
Replies: 1
Views: 1559
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue May 18, 2004 12:20 am Subject: aggregation and control messages in wbimb |
| I have set up a test aggregation in wbimb and, as far as I can see, no control messages are ever sent (i.e. nothing ever propagates from the control terminal of the AggregateControl node). I've tried ... |
| Topic: wmqi expiry processing |
tonym
Replies: 8
Views: 3907
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 1:31 am Subject: wmqi expiry processing |
Has anyone seen inaccuracies when WMQI converts the internal expiry property (GMTTIMESTAMP) into actual message expiry (tenths of seconds)?
Prior to writing a message, I have the following properties ... |
| Topic: referencing esql files from a different project |
tonym
Replies: 3
Views: 2299
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 5:19 am Subject: referencing esql files from a different project |
Yes, I can get Procedures and Functions to work cross projects, but the documentation states that a node can use an entire esql file (i.e. a file with a CREATE MODULE stanza) from another project.
... |
| Topic: referencing esql files from a different project |
tonym
Replies: 3
Views: 2299
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2003 4:48 am Subject: referencing esql files from a different project |
I'm testing out WBIMBs ability to have a common set of esql files available to multiple projects.
I've defined some esql files in a project called PROJECT_COMMON and I'm trying to reference them from ... |
| Topic: WBIMB bar files and common sub-flows. |
tonym
Replies: 1
Views: 1660
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 1:44 am Subject: WBIMB bar files and common sub-flows. |
WBIMB seems to completely change the way in which common sub-flows can be utilised by WMQI.
Suppose I create a bar file - BAR1 - which includes a top level flow - FLOW1 - and a sub-flow called SUB1 ... |
| Topic: Accuracy of expiry |
tonym
Replies: 5
Views: 2889
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 1:37 am Subject: Accuracy of expiry |
| I'm not asking about mq processing once a message is expired. I was wondering how accurately the expiry property was decremented. Basically, if I calculate "original expiry" minus "remaining expiry", ... |
| Topic: Accuracy of expiry |
tonym
Replies: 5
Views: 2889
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:50 pm Subject: Accuracy of expiry |
| I put a message on a queue and then, at a later stage remove that message from the queue. No intercommunication is involved - the message has remained on that single queue for the entire time. Will t ... |
