| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQAttach for MQ FTE |
tongai
Replies: 1
Views: 3817
|
 Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:37 am Subject: MQAttach for MQ FTE |
Hi Andre,
I appreciate my reply comes late, but we are currently considering implementing MQAttach as well. Did you finally implement it in production or did you use another tool? Any information wou ... |
| Topic: Messages stuck in SYSTEM.CLUSTER.TRANSMIT.QUEUE and refuse |
tongai
Replies: 40
Views: 73442
|
Forum: Clustering Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:06 pm Subject: Please give some details of the network issues faced. |
| Hello, we are experiencing very similar symptoms in our production MQ environment. Could you please provide details of the network issues you faced which caused this problem. Even better, would be, if ... |
| Topic: Transport For SOAP |
tongai
Replies: 2
Views: 6807
|
Forum: IBM MQ Java / JMS Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:14 am Subject: MQ Transport For SOAP issue |
Hi Vinnie,
I had exactly the same problem yesterday. I eventually solved it by escaping the brackets around the port as follows and it does actually work!
Specify the "clientConnection" ... |
| Topic: MB 6.0 JVM properties |
tongai
Replies: 6
Views: 8871
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:06 am Subject: MB 6.0 JVM properties |
| I just came across this while checking IBM message broker V6.0 documentation with regard to the JVM <http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wmbhelp/v6r0m0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.etools.mft.doc/ ... |
| Topic: Oracle 10g |
tongai
Replies: 5
Views: 5174
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:08 am Subject: Oracle 10g |
| Cheers mate! |
| Topic: Oracle 10g |
tongai
Replies: 5
Views: 5174
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:36 am Subject: Oracle 10g support for MQSI v2.1 |
Hi Ian/anyone else,
although we are planning an upgrade to WBIMB v5.0/v6.0 we are still running MQSI v2.1 CSD07. A database upgrade from Oracle 81 to 10g may come sooner than the MQSI upgrade, hence ... |
