| Author |
Message |
 Topic: MQ and Kerberos |
seanb
Replies: 4
Views: 3846
|
 Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:15 am Subject: MQ and Kerberos |
| Thanks Jeff, I'll check that out now. |
| Topic: MQ and Kerberos |
seanb
Replies: 4
Views: 3846
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:12 am Subject: MQ and Kerberos |
Yes I have, but these deal with security exits on channels.
I am specifically looking for LDAP support with the setmqaut command (and associated application access). My original post was a little u ... |
| Topic: MQ and Kerberos |
seanb
Replies: 4
Views: 3846
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:32 am Subject: MQ and Kerberos |
We are in the process of of implementing Kerberos.
All my research and testing shows that MQ is not LDAP compliant and that we still need to define local OS user IDs and groups for use with MQ. Thi ... |
| Topic: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
seanb
Replies: 17
Views: 31028
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:50 am Subject: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
The AIX iFix refers to fix IY66127 on AIX 5.2 or fix IY66147 on AIX 5.3. Ask your AIX admin to check whether they're installed.
If you follow the URL in the original posting it will contain this in ... |
| Topic: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
seanb
Replies: 17
Views: 31028
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:03 am Subject: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
| The new "magic number" works a charm. Setting to "MAXDATA=0XB0000000@DSA" solved our problems. Thanks. |
| Topic: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
seanb
Replies: 17
Views: 31028
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:24 am Subject: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
No luck.
1/2/4...done (re. 3, set to 0X60000000@DSA although from the previous FDC I see the value was 0XA0000000@DSA); 3...didn't see it being set anywhere but will double check; the FDC file sugg ... |
| Topic: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
seanb
Replies: 17
Views: 31028
|
Forum: WebSphere Process Server (WID/WPS/WAS+) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:25 am Subject: WAS, Bindings connections, and EXTSHM |
Jeff,
Have you progressed any further on this problem?
We are having similar problems since moving to MQ 6 on a WAS 5.1.1.8 (yes, even older than your version) application. We migrated two serve ... |
| Topic: WMQ Disaster Recovery Design & Implementation |
seanb
Replies: 9
Views: 9915
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:15 am Subject: WMQ Disaster Recovery Design & Implementation |
| We use PPRC quite successfully here. We have tested (daily restarting plus an annual DR test) restarting MQ and all our applications with data FLASHCOPIED from the PPRC data sent to the remote site. W ... |
| Topic: Shared queues and CICS and clustering |
seanb
Replies: 4
Views: 5970
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 pm Subject: Shared queues and CICS and clustering |
| No. We only trigger batch jobs on non-shared queues. My guess is it would be the same as CICS. |
| Topic: Shared queues and CICS and clustering |
seanb
Replies: 4
Views: 5970
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:57 am Subject: Shared queues and CICS and clustering |
| Whichever CICS region/transaction gets to the message first will process the message. It is basically a race between the CICS regions. If one is busy you may see more of the messages processing in the ... |
| Topic: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
seanb
Replies: 15
Views: 22721
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:49 pm Subject: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
That explains the WIH. During my investigations for the CICS bridge problems I changed the index to MSGTOKEN briefly (don't ask me why I'm not sure myself, I think something I read somewhere  ). I ... |
| Topic: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
seanb
Replies: 15
Views: 22721
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:40 am Subject: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
| Now that is interesting! I don't know much about our programs here but I did a quick check and they don't add it. I have noticed the MQWIH is not present when running with V5.3.1 but it is present whe ... |
| Topic: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
seanb
Replies: 15
Views: 22721
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:25 am Subject: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
An update. I have just noticed the following in the SYSLOG. I only checked the CICSLOG and MQLOG before  . We are investigating now.
CSQI043E *2D CSQIWSCL WLM IWMQINS request for process 236 ... |
| Topic: z/os without CAF in eclipse explorer |
seanb
Replies: 3
Views: 9510
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:48 pm Subject: z/os without CAF in eclipse explorer |
I have not used an intermediate QM but I do use MQ Explorer via the CAF. I would assume similar definitons are required.
Did you check whether the queue SYSTEM.ADMIN.COMMAND.QUEUE is defined on z/O ... |
| Topic: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
seanb
Replies: 15
Views: 22721
|
Forum: Mainframe, CICS, TXSeries Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:19 am Subject: CICS bridge not processing messages after migrating to MQ V6 |
Yes, we have double checked that. Also, the monitor writes a CICS message when it starts suggesting it has picked up the correct libraries/modules.
CSQC700I CKBR 0003658 IBM WebSphere MQ for z/OS V ... |
