| Author |
Message |
 Topic: IIB 10 and MQ Appliance |
muralihegde
Replies: 7
Views: 6347
|
 Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 12:04 am Subject: IIB 10 and MQ Appliance |
| True, as of now we have the local QM on the same server as IIB. However we are consolidating all QMs to the MQ Appliance. The goal is to remove all the QMs on individual servers, so all QMs can be mai ... |
| Topic: IIB 10 and MQ Appliance |
muralihegde
Replies: 7
Views: 6347
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 12:30 am Subject: IIB 10 and MQ Appliance |
| Is there an impact or challenge if we migrate the Queue Manager that supports the IIB to the MQ appliance, if some of our message flows use aggregation ? We plan to do some tests on this and will upda ... |
| Topic: MQ Appliance-File System allocation |
muralihegde
Replies: 0
Views: 2762
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 12:23 am Subject: MQ Appliance-File System allocation |
| I understand that after a queue manager is created on the Appliance, we cannot resize the file system; The info center link below says ensure the value that is specified here is sufficient for the cur ... |
| Topic: Migrating to the MQ Appliance - User ID authority/config |
muralihegde
Replies: 3
Views: 4375
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 10:28 pm Subject: Migrating to the MQ Appliance - User ID authority/config |
| Thanks. We will explore that in more detail about using CHLAUTH. However as of now we just added appluserid1 in the MCAUSER() of the channel and the perl script was able to connect from Unix even thou ... |
| Topic: Migrating to the MQ Appliance - User ID authority/config |
muralihegde
Replies: 3
Views: 4375
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:47 am Subject: Migrating to the MQ Appliance - User ID authority/config |
We are migrating the Q-mgrs from Unix to MQ Appliance. (MQ V9.0x)
On the MQ Appliance, we are not using local users/groups, but LDAP is being used. However on the current Unix systems, LDAP is not ... |
| Topic: IIB 10 and MQ Appliance |
muralihegde
Replies: 7
Views: 6347
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:18 am Subject: IIB 10 and MQ Appliance |
Has anyone already configured IIB10 that connects an MQ Queue Manager running on MQ Appliance?
The MQ Appliance info center mentions that QMs on the appliance cannot act as transaction managers, b ... |
| Topic: runmqdlq |
muralihegde
Replies: 1
Views: 2792
|
Forum: General IBM MQ Support Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:22 am Subject: runmqdlq |
| Is there a document or link that explains what is the syntax of the rule file that needs to be created to run the runmqdlq command? |
| Topic: Storing Java Objects in Global Environment |
muralihegde
Replies: 1
Views: 1891
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 7:00 am Subject: Storing Java Objects in Global Environment |
Is it possible to store a java object in the environment variable. We are
1. creating a java object in a java compute node, say a session object
2. store that in a global environment and pass it ... |
| Topic: Maximum length of execution group and message broker name |
muralihegde
Replies: 7
Views: 8515
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:10 am Subject: Maximum length of execution group and message broker name |
I am restarting this topic  . I understand that 40 characters are more than enough. However I just want to know what the documentation also says, but I was not able to find it in the WMB documentatio ... |
| Topic: Usage of Apache Commons with Message Broker |
muralihegde
Replies: 2
Views: 2645
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:26 am Subject: Usage of Apache Commons with Message Broker |
Thanks. I will check with the development team to verify the usage of Global Cache.
I agree it is recommended to go ahead and install the APAR.
However on a practical point of view, with the numbe ... |
| Topic: Usage of Apache Commons with Message Broker |
muralihegde
Replies: 2
Views: 2645
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:56 am Subject: Usage of Apache Commons with Message Broker |
| We are using WebSphere Message Broker V8.0. We will need to determine if we are using Apache Commons as part of the implementation? We are trying to look for information as to which specific feature o ... |
| Topic: Changing additional instances without redeploying |
muralihegde
Replies: 8
Views: 7174
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 6:11 am Subject: Changing additional instances without redeploying |
| Thank you maurito. As you suggested, we tried using the Broker/WMQ Explorer. We are able to change the additional instances using that option. |
| Topic: Changing additional instances without redeploying |
muralihegde
Replies: 8
Views: 7174
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:36 am Subject: Changing additional instances without redeploying |
| We have WMB 8.0.0.5 on AIX. Is it possible to increase or decrease the additional instance of the flow, during run time, without redeploying the bar file? If possible, are there any mqsi broker comman ... |
| Topic: Number of additional instances used at run time. |
muralihegde
Replies: 0
Views: 1821
|
Forum: WebSphere Message Broker (ACE) Support Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 3:10 am Subject: Number of additional instances used at run time. |
Is there a way to know how many additional instances of the WMB flows are being used/invoked at any point of time?
We have message flows that are exposed as web services. We have additional instanc ... |
| Topic: Changing an existing MQ installation to PRIMARy |
muralihegde
Replies: 20
Views: 42080
|
Forum: IBM MQ Installation/Configuration Support Posted: Thu May 07, 2015 3:58 am Subject: Changing an existing MQ installation to PRIMARy |
I wanted to confirm this. We have the below scenario.
1) We had MQ 7.0.1.12 version and few queue managers on this.
2) We installed MQ 7.5.0.4, along with this, using the multi-stage approach
3 ... |
