ASG
IBM
Zystems
Cressida
Icon
Netflexity
 
  MQSeries.net
Search  Search       Tech Exchange      Education      Certifications      Library      Info Center      SupportPacs      LinkedIn  Search  Search                                                                   FAQ  FAQ   Usergroups  Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
RSS Feed - WebSphere MQ Support RSS Feed - Message Broker Support

MQSeries.net Forum Index » Search

 Search found 1111 matches
Author Message
  Topic: Lower traffic
mqonnet

Replies: 53
Views: 31966

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:18 am   Subject: Lower traffic
I am not against upgrades or newer versions of the products. But it should have some value for "everyone" and not just "a segment of the industry" that uses a specific feature. Rel ...
  Topic: Lower traffic
mqonnet

Replies: 53
Views: 31966

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:15 am   Subject: Lower traffic
I am not against upgrades or newer versions of the products. But it should have some value for "everyone" and not just "a segment of the industry" that uses a specific feature. R ...
  Topic: Lower traffic
mqonnet

Replies: 53
Views: 31966

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:26 pm   Subject: Lower traffic
V7.0 is the most pathetic MQ release ever. It was LITERALLY released so that they continue the "release cycle". Other than MQ FTE and a few pub/sub elements, there is literally nothing in th ...
  Topic: Lower traffic
mqonnet

Replies: 53
Views: 31966

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 10:18 am   Subject: Lower traffic
MQv7.0.0.0 may not have "significant" changes for many typical uses of MQ in enterprises.

MQv7.0.1.0 certainly does. Multi-instance qmgrs is *big*, and so is client reconnect features. ...
  Topic: Lower traffic
mqonnet

Replies: 53
Views: 31966

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 8:05 am   Subject: Lower traffic
V7.0 is the most pathetic MQ release ever. It was LITERALLY released so that they continue the "release cycle". Other than MQ FTE and a few pub/sub elements, there is literally nothing in ...
  Topic: Impact 2010 - Post Conference Comments
mqonnet

Replies: 13
Views: 11943

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 7:50 am   Subject: Re: Impact 2010 - Post Conference Comments
I missed the 2009 conference, But there was a significant lack of familiar faces in 2010, thus I know there's probably only a few of you here that may have attended the Impact 2010 Conference. If yo ...
  Topic: Lower traffic
mqonnet

Replies: 53
Views: 31966

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 7:36 am   Subject: Lower traffic
Let me give you my point of view (after vanishing off of this forum for a few years. )

When MQ started off in a big way, there were many questions by BOTH, those who were already well versed wi ...
  Topic: Impact 2009 - Feedback
mqonnet

Replies: 5
Views: 7286

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:39 am   Subject: Impact 2009 - Feedback
Not sure what was the point of referring Twitter once in ever 5 sentences. Did IBM buy twitter by any chance??? Incidentally i didn't know that twitter was this big until i attended the conference. ...
  Topic: Impact 2009 - Feedback
mqonnet

Replies: 5
Views: 7286

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:05 am   Subject: Impact 2009 - Feedback
Not to mention the "show-off" from Sandy Carter when she was consistently stating that "IBM Impact 2009" is among the top 10 most searched and active keywords on Twitter. With ove ...
  Topic: Impact 2009 - Feedback
mqonnet

Replies: 5
Views: 7286

PostForum: General Discussion   Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 10:31 am   Subject: Impact 2009 - Feedback
This sounds ridiculous but IBM doesn't really have a way to provide this feedback to them directly. But i hope that someone from IBM actually forwards this "first hand" feedback to the uppe ...
  Topic: Have you faced anything like this?
mqonnet

Replies: 14
Views: 14452

PostForum: Clustering   Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:07 am   Subject: Have you faced anything like this?
See point i want to highlight is "imbalance" is created by the architecture , so is the behavior. Clustering is grouping of "similar" nodes, now we introduce one node like unlike ...
  Topic: Have you faced anything like this?
mqonnet

Replies: 14
Views: 14452

PostForum: Clustering   Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:02 am   Subject: Have you faced anything like this?
Good points.
Let me try and answer your thoughts.

This is not a "BUG" in any means , lets take step back and look at this.
- You develop and sell a product. Your product does 10 thing ...
  Topic: Have you faced anything like this?
mqonnet

Replies: 14
Views: 14452

PostForum: Clustering   Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:00 am   Subject: Have you faced anything like this?
Peter,

Appreciate your comments.

What you suggested is what we also thought of and was in fact suggested by IBM as well. But the problem is, this approach is NOT practical. We design and archi ...
  Topic: Have you faced anything like this?
mqonnet

Replies: 14
Views: 14452

PostForum: Clustering   Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:53 am   Subject: Have you faced anything like this?
By the way, can someone from IBM (Jeff or others) please fix the spelling mistake on this url?

Local fix

Recycling all QM's in the cluster will reset counters which are
at the root cause of t ...
  Topic: Have you faced anything like this?
mqonnet

Replies: 14
Views: 14452

PostForum: Clustering   Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:47 am   Subject: Have you faced anything like this?
Peter,

Thanks for chipping in. Incidentally, IBM also proposed the same fix and we applied it. But it turns out that the wording in the APAR description is misleading and Hursley is wor ...
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 73, 74, 75  Next Page 1 of 75

Jump to:  
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
 
 


Theme by Dustin Baccetti
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Copyright © MQSeries.net. All rights reserved.